Dismissed

Kandi Ram Reddy v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Telangana HC14 Nov 2023CRLP/12551/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Telangana disposed of a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash proceedings as infructuous due to inability to contact the accused. The court examined the petitioner's suggestion to close the file and the Public Prosecutor's objection, ultimately dismissing the petition as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kandi Ram Reddy Vs the State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32e9 I

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE^{FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYTHREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL}

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NO:1 2551oF 2015}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Kandi Ram Reddy,^{S/o Late NarasimhaReddy'Occ Agriculture'R/o'3-135/2'} grnpfoy"". Colony, Yapral, Malkaigiri, Mandal,^{Ranga ReddyDistrict}

¶9

...Petitioner/Accused

¶10

AND

¶11

1 . The State Of^Telangana ,^{Rep by its Public Prosecutor'High Court at} Hyderabad.

¶12

Bharat, B.Karamchandani,^{Occ Employee, eUo' 4-1-122914' Boggulakunta'} Hyderabad

¶13

"'Respondenucomplainant

¶14

Petition under^{Section482 of Cr'P C praying that in the circumstances} statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition'theHighCourtmay ["^pr"rruJ to^{quashtt e crimin"r Fioceedingsagainstthe petitioner in cr.No .687} -Magistrate, at Malkajgiri' Cyberabad' of 2012 on the^{fite ot tte ii"liTei-potit"n} R.R.District.

¶15

t.A. NO:¹ 0F^{2015(CRLPMP. NO:1 2533oF20't5)}

¶16

Petition under^{Section 482 of Cr'P'Cpraying that in the circumstances} statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition'theHighCourt.may [" p]"r*O to^{Stay all furtneiproceedings including appearance of the Petitioner} in Cr. No.6B7 of^2O1Z ""^{,h" iii;;th"iX} lr,l"tropotiian^{Magistrate,Cyberabad,} n.R.Oi.tri"t, at^{Malkaigiri pending disposalof ttle abovecriminal petition'}

¶17

This Petition^{comangon for hearing' upon perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of^{criminatpetitiin anJuJonnelringtne_aroumentsof Sri UMA DEVI} NAMA, Advocate^{for tne p"t'tiol"', Sri VIZARATYH nlt'Assistant -Public} Prosecutor, on^{behalf ot-tneRespondentNo.1 and Noneappearedfor the} Respondent^No.2

¶18

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

¶19

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE E' V' VENUGOPAL} cRIMINAL^{PETITION No.L2551 0F 2015}

¶20

ORD ER:

¶21

This criminal^{petitionis filed to quash the proceedings} against^{the petitioner/accused in C'C'No'687of 2Ol5 on the file} at Malkajgiri, of the XX^{Metropolitan MagistrateCyberabad} Ranga ReddY^District'

¶22

L,earned counsel^{for the petitionerwould submitthat the} efforts made^{to contact the petitioner have gone in vain and} hence^{seeks to close the criminal petition'}

¶23

Mr.Vizarath^{Ali, tearned AssistantPublic Prosecutor is} present and^{takesno objectionto the same'}

¶24

Recording^{the submissions made by the learned counselfor} the petitioner^{and learnedAssistant Public Prosecutor' this} Criminal^{Petition is dismissedas infructuous'}

¶25

Miscellaneous^{Petitions, pendingif an} y, shall stand^closed. - Sol-v. nlru^PBASAD ASslsrANr^REGTTRAR

/TTRUE^COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

The XX Metropolitan^{Magistrate'at Malkaigiri'-Cyberabad'R'R'District'} 23 The Station Two CCs^{to PUBLIC House officer, pnosEculbC' tr.nrigrJ" High Court for P"ti"ceStaiion'.cyberabad-DjsJrig!,--^the State of Telangana'} Hvderabad.[OUT]

¶31

4 lj,nl ccti;^{uutn oevt NAMAAdvocate [oPUc]} 5 Two CD CoPies SP ?flc^

HIGH COURT

DATED:1411112023

ORDER

CRLP.No.12551of²⁰¹⁵

SIATE oA
q C)
lo [1 JIN 1t1\ *Ai
l< p.''qo l,i c

¶37

DISMISSING THE^{CRIMINALPETITIONAS} INFRUCTUOUS

¶38

?r^(" @Crltol Gvs"\Y'tr+'

Kandi Ram Reddy v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Kandi Ram Reddy v. the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dungrothu Nagaraju Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Dungrothu Nagaraju Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another]

Ramesh chandra sinha and Another Vs Serious Fraud Investigation Office, New Delhi

Mr.G.Ram Murthy Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Akash Deepsingh Virk Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Pilli Uday Kumar, Hyd Vs Smt.Pilli Vijaya Mary, Nizamabad Dist and Two Others