The petitioner sought quashing and stay of criminal proceedings. The respondent State took no objection. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTYFIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINALP ETITIONNO: 't0467 OF 2015
Between:
Mrs. Usha Aoarwal, Wo.Raiesh Kumar Agarwal,Aged about52 years' Occ i"r."norO R/; 21-6455,GhansiBazar' Hyderabad-S0O002' T S'
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDENT'COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section482 of Cr.P C prayrngthat rn the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition, the High court may o"pr",""otoquashtheaboveinC.C.No'54of20l5onthefileofVllSpecial Magistrate Court,Hyderabad against the petitioner herein'
CRLPMP. NO.,t0472oF 2015
Petition under Section482 ot ct.P .c prayingthat rn the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition, the High court may o" pf "r."J to stayall further proceedings in C 'C No 54 of 2015 on the file of Vif'Sp"""f Magisfrate,HyderaUad, includingthe appearanceof the Petitioner in the above case,pending disposal of the Criminal Petition'
This Petition comingon for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition and upon hearrngthe argumentsof Sri PAWAN KUMARAGARWAL'AdvocateforthePetitionerandthePublicProsecutor,on behalf of the RespondentNo.1and of Sri N Vinesh Raj' Advocate for the Respondent No.2(Not Present)
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
I
t {
t
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1O467 OF 2015
ORDER:
Learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr.Pawan Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject mattef of the case has become infructuous and therefore seeks to withdraw the Criminal Petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/.P. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ry"SECTION OFFICER
To,
t Vll Special Magistrate, Hyderabad.
D]\ BN
{ I
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 11112023
ORDER
CRLP.No.10467 of 2015
riE STAfe
1
q
c
d 12 tiB 2o2l
)
"!-
Dsspa.i cv.\c9
Criminal Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn.
I C rult-, BN-ifi(,-, +
Mrs. Usha Aoarwal
State of Telangana
Mr. D.P. Tiwari
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
