M. Balraj v. K. Venkat Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case alleging disobedience to a High Court order regarding land demarcation, the court examined the respondent's affidavit. Finding that demarcation could not proceed due to missing records, the court closed the contempt case without any order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed, petitioner advised to avail of alternate remedies.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3167 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1332OF 2022
Contempt Case under Section'10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for willfully violating the Order of the High Court dated 0411012021 inWP No.24421 of 2021
Between:
$.Bal1aj,S/o Komaraiah,Aged 59 years,Occ.-business, Rl/o H.No. B-7-451'llB,Rda Rajeshwari Nagar, Road No.9, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad - 50001 1. ...PETITIONERyPETITIONER
AND
K.Venkat Reddy, Thasildhar, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,.
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1. Balaj, S/o Komaraiah
- respondent
K. Venkat Reddy
Coram
A. Abhishek Reddy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1332/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court