Court. So also, plaintiff examined p.W.3, hand writing expert to prove the hand writing and signature of Omkari Veerosa on trx.Al and A2O and he clearly stated that the said hand writing and signatures on both the documents are of the one and the same person. Therefore, this Court finds no reason to disbelieve the contention of the plaintiff regarding execution of sale deed in their favour way back in the year 1955 and 1959 respectively. Of course, when Ex.A 1 was filed before the Court, the said document was impounded and the relevant Stamp Duty was paid, therefore the validity of the sale deed cannot be questioned now. Even D.W.2 admitted during his cross_examination regarding Ex.A20, though he could not say the extent of land, he stated that his father signed the document in his own capacity and also as the guardian of his brother and he signed it as an attester and it was executed for Rs.33,OOO/-. Aparl from that he also admitted regarding Ex.A 1 and stated that society has an intention to establish bone crushing unit and they established the same in the land which was sold by his father. This clearly shows that knowing pretty well about the execution of the document in favour of the plaintiff society, with an ulterior motive, he along with his brother executed the registered sale deed in favour of the defendants in the vear 1985 to defeat the interest of the plaintiff society.
