The High Court disposed of a long-pending writ appeal on relation to suspended orders, directing the single judge to list the underlying writ petition for disposal without deciding the appeal on merits.
The writ appeal was disposed of; W.P. No. 15293 of 2007 to be listed on 28.02.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 394 OF 2008
writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letterspatent Appeal preferred against order dt.20-09-2007 in w.V.M.P.No.2162 ot 2007 in w.p.No.1b293 of 2oo7 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
I
I
| 1 | Mrs.Raqya Bee,Wo.Late ShaikChand, Aged about 62years,Occ:Household./ |
|---|---|
| ) | Mohd. Iqbal,S/o.LateShaikChand, Agedabout 49 years,Or:c:Business./ |
| J | FakheerMiyan,S/o.Late Mohd.Miyan, Aged57years,Occ:Br.rsiness. |
| 1 | Mohd. AkheelAhrned, S/o.LateMohd.Maqbool, Aged about30years, Occ:Business. |
| 5 | Mohs.Rat'eeq,S/o.Late ShaikChand, Agedabut42years,Occ:Business. |
| 6 | Mohd.Zaheed,S/o.Late ShaikChand, Agedabout 40 years,Occ:Business. |
| 7 | Mohd.Riyaz,S/o.LateShaik Chand, Agedabout34years,Occ:Business. |
| 8 | Mohd.Riase, S/o.LateShaik Chand, Agedabout 25 years, Occ: Business. |
| 9 | Smt.IqbalJahan,Wo.LateMohd.Maqbool, Agedabout49years,Occ:Household. |
| 10, | Md.Shakeel, S/o. LateMohd.Maqbool, Agedabout28 years,Occ: Businesi. |
| 11. | Md.Zameel,S/o.Late Mohd. Maqbool, Aged23 years,Occ:Br.rsiness. Contd..2. |
l I
Contd.'3'
a
I
AMP. F
Petition un er sect ion 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may bJ pleasedto suspend the operation of the orders inW.V.lV.P.No.2162ot 2007 in W.P.No.15293 of 2007, dt. 20-9-2007 pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.
Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI VENUGOPAL JULAKANTI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH C}IANDRASTIARMA THE HON'BL ' AND
THE HOI<sup>,BLE SRIJUSTIC E ABHINANDKUMARS}IAVILI
WRIT No.394 oF2008
JUDG MENT, fp"heHon'bte the Ctdef Justice Satish C'andraSl,,m.o)
The pres:ntwrit appealis arising out of the interlocutory order dated20 )g.2OO7 passedin W'P'No'15293 of 2OO7'
The ordt rdaIed, 20 'O9 '2007has been suspended in the present writappeal by anorder dated 1O'O4 2008 in W.A.M.P.No'83I)of2003andtheaforesaidorderofsuspensionhas been continuin 1since 2008 We are in the year2022 and the writ petition is stiil Irending'
Therefore atthe request of learned counselfor the parties' the presentwri appealis disposed of with a requestto the learned Single Judget I decide the writ petitionitself at an early date Office isdirectr d to list W P'No'15293 of 2OO7 before the learned Single Judgehr ving roster on 28 'O2 2022'
Pendingmiscellaneousapplications,ifany,Shallstand
ciosed.There slallbe no orderas to costs'
D'.tsSAl1+-$'[t?HXf;
I
\r"
//TRUE coPY// sECTloNoFFICER
"ii[:E"{r-H,i'#,ln{,i{H't"f;ti{flHi:Il'q'd#i:::::""'
, Bl'""Lt?SstiVJ' usop'r Julakanti' AdvocatetoPucl
CHR BS
$x
*J& ..,il
t
_r
URcerur
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 'll02l'.''022
POSTON 28/0
.-a-'-'
,r' '1nr 5 'AI€
( 1.
15 riB 2C22
aJot
z*:
JUDGMENT
W.A.No.394of 2008
DISPOSINGOI: THE WRIT APPEAL WTTHOUTCOS TS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ appeal pending disposal of the petition below.
Mrs. Rqya Bee and Others
Sri. P.S.I. Constructions
The Sub-Registrar, Hyderabad
The District Registrar, Hyderabad
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
