Allowed

Madapathi Shivaraj Swamy and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and 7 others

Telangana HC15 Feb 2022WP/3847/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging non-conduct of sub-division survey and fixation of boundary stones by revenue authorities. Court directed the Tahsildar to complete the survey and demarcation within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Tahsildar to conduct survey and fix boundary stones within two months by issuing notice to all concerned.

Madapathi Shivaraj Swamy and 3 others Vs The… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR^{THESTATEOFTELANGANA} (Special Original J urisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH^{DAYOF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE B.VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITION^{NO: 3847 OF 2022}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Madapathi^{Shivaraj Swamv,S/oM Nagaiahswamy' Age about 63 ygar9' 999-} ifi.fit,;;;, R/i.H.ilo.-^{r-60,-xlngtivittage and trlandal, sangareddvDistrict-} 502286,T.S.

¶8

Madapathi^Ravikumar @^{Ravindar, S/o M Nagaiah swamvAoe about 53 vears'} - 6Jd--'ndi"urrr;;: R/o.E.G: 1€0,-xangti Village and' Ma-ndal' sansareddv Districr5O2286,T.S.

¶9

Madapathi^{Ashok kumar'S/o.M Nagaiah swamy'Ageabout61 yqaE.999-} - dilit|j;;, nvo.H.ruo.- r-s0^{-xanstiVittage} and'lrilan-dal' sangareddy District' 502286,T.S.

¶10

Madapathi Shivakumar'^{S/o.l'4 Nagaiahswamy'. Ageabout 73 vears'Occ-} ' I;;;it.;;;. ruo r tto' r-:tio". xi"bliVli'ge in'i'r'/a"no"t' saneareiidv District502286,T.5.

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of^{Telangana,Rep. by PrincipleSecretary, Revenue Deparlment'} Secretariat,^Hyderabad.

¶14

2 The District Collector,^{Sangareddy District}

¶15

3 The Additional^{Collector(Revenue), Sangareddy District'}

¶16

4 The Revenue^{Divisionalofficer,Narayanakhed Division , sangareddyDistrict} 5 The Tahsildar,^{Kangti Mandal,sangareddyDistrict'}

¶17

The Assistant^{Director ( Survey ( Survey Surveyand Land records), records),Sangareddy District'District'}

¶18

6 The Assistant^{Director ( Survey ( Survey Surveyand Land records), records),Sangareddy District'District'} 7 The Deputy^{lnspector (Land Survey), Narayanakhed Division} '^Sangareddy District.

¶19

B The Mandal^{Surveyor, Kangti Mandal,sangareddyDistrict'}

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

PetitionunderAnicle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances^{statedin the affidavit filed therewith,the Highcourt may be pleased.to} issue a writ, one^{in the nature of a Writof Mandamusor any other appropriateWrit} oir""tion or order^{declaringthe action of the respondentsin not conductingthe Sub} oiui"ion .u*"v^{andnot fixiigthe boundary stones of total-and admeasuringAc19-22} c"nt"1 in-suir"y^{No.171lAi/3,'171lAAlfor an extent of Ac'4 36 guntas'in surve-y} f.ro. iirtnfl+, 1i1lAA3^{for an extent of Ac.4-35 guntas and in survey No 171lA1/5'} llttl,,ll for an^{extent of Ac.4.35guntas, and in surveyNo 1711A112'171lAA2lotan} "*t"ni^{ot Ac.4.36 guntas,situatEdat Kangti Villageand Mandal'Narayanakhed} Oiuision, S"ngaredd-y^{Districteven after subiritting the prescribedForm F-Line Sub-} Oiviiion' Recelpt^{and drlypaying the requisiteamount.of Rs 295/-in theMeeseva} ['"",i"g Appfr;"tion^{No,'DER02]2100725016as illegal, arbitraryand violativeof} prin"ipies^'of natural^{justice,and consequentlydirectthe respondenls5 to 8} -to [""J,i"i in"^{suruey rnd fix theboundariesof ihe total land admeasuring Ac 19-22} Cr.tri i"^{iurvey'N|o.171lA113,171lAA1for an extentof Ac 4 36 guntas in survey} tlo. izlell+. 17ilAA3^{for an extent of Ac.4-35 guntas and in survey No' '171lA1/5'} 171lAA4 for an^{extentof Ac.4.35 guntas,and in surveyNo 171/A1/2'171lAA2Iotan}

¶22

extent of Ac.4.36^guntas, situated at^{Kangti Villageand Mandal,Narayanakhed} Division, Sangareddy District

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶24

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleasedto direct the} respondents 5 to 8 to conduct the^{survey andfix the boundary stones of total land} admeasuring Ac.1g-22 Guntas in Survey^{No.17'1lA113,171lAA1for an extentof} Ac.4.36 guntas, in survey No. 17'1lA1/4,^{171lAA3 for an exlent of Ac4-35 guntasand} in survey No. 171lA1/5, 171lAA4 for an^{extent of Ac.4.35 guntas, andin surveyNo} 1711A112, 171tAA2 for an extenl of^{Ac.4.36 guntas, situatedat Kangti Villageand} Mandal, Narayanakhed Division, Sangareddy^{District pending disposal of the above} writ petition and^pass

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl.^{K KIRAN KUMAR}

¶27

Counsel for the Respondents: AGP^{FOR REVENUE}

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICEB. VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶30

WRIT PI'TITI(^{)N NO,38} 17^()F 2022

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

This Writ Petition is^{liled to declare the actionof the} respondents^{in not conductingthe Sub Division survey and not} fixing the^{bounciary stonesin survey No 171/A1/3' 171/AAlfor} an extent^{of Acs.4.36gts, in survey No 171A1/4'171/AA3 for an} extentofAcs.435gtsandinsurveyNo'171/A1/5'lTllAA4loran extentofAcs.4.35gtsandinsurveyNo'l7llAll2'lTLlAA2loran extentofAcs'4.36gtssituatedatKangtiVillageandManda]' Narayanakhed^{Division,SangareddyDistrict'}

¶33

Petitioners are the^{absolute owners, possessors and} abovementioned^{land, which theyacquired} pattadars oI^the through^{their ancestorsand their names were mutatedin the} revenue records^{andpattadarpassbookswere also issuedvide} T09090140488^{and khatha No 616,TO9090140360and khatha} No.447,^{T09O9O140O2Oand khathaNo 22' T0909014O489and} khatha No.6lT^{Petitionershave been in physicalpossession of} the property^{and they have paid requisile fee throughMee-Seva} and submitted^{F-Line application videNo DERO22|OO725OL6lor} survey^{of land and fixation of boundaries'}

¶34

The^{grievance of the petitioners is that respondents arenot} expediting^{the survey pursuantto F-Line application'}

¶35

Learned Assistant^{Government Pleader submitsthat} appropriate^{directionsbe issued to the fifth respondentto conduct} survey and^{demarcatethe boundaries'} -

¶36

The Writ^{Petitionis disposed of directing the frfth respondent} to conduct^{surveyand demarcate the abovementioned land}

¶37

¶38

BVR,J w.P.NO.3847 0F 2022

¶39

pursuant to the F-Line application submitted by the petitioners by

¶40

issuing notice to all concerned. The entirc excrcise shall be completed within rwo (2) months from the darc of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶41

There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous

¶42

applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶43

//TRUE COPY//

¶44

SD/- T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (_l i 'r SECTION OFFICER

¶45

To,

¶46

1 . The Principle Secretary,^{State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Secretariat,} Hyderabad.

¶47

The District Collector,^{SangareddyDistrict.}

¶48

The Additional^{Collector (Revenue), Sangareddy District.}

¶49

The Revenue Divisional Officer,^{Narayanakhed Division , Sangareddy District}

¶50

The Tahsildar, Kangti^{Mandal,SangareddyDistrict.}

¶51

The Assistant Director⁽ Survey^{and Land records), Sangareddy District}

¶52

The Deputy lnspector^{(Land Survey), Narayanakhed Division , Sangareddy} District.

¶53

The Mandal Surveyor,^{Kangti firandal,SangareddyDistrict.}

¶54

One CC to SRI. K^{KIRAN KU[,4ARAdvocate} [OPUC]

¶55

10.Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High^{Court forthe State of Telangana} [OUT]

¶56

1 1 . Two CD Copies

¶57

One Spare Copy rsn +-

g")

HIGH COURT

OATEOi1sl0212022

1k\ E STAI€
(
q
02 l:ii 202
i oo
\i- - ;-

¶63

ORDER

¶64

WP.No.3847 of²⁰²²

¶65

DISPOSING^{OFTHE WRIT PETITION}

¶66

WITHOUT COSTS

¶67

{uJ
<z-6

¶68

Madapathi Shivaraj Swamy and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and 7 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madapathi Shivaraj Swamy and 3 others v. The State of Telangana and 7 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kotagalla Raj Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. K. Chinamma , Chenamma Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Nethikoppula Venkanna Vs The State of Telangana

Kanna Madhav Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Kotanguri Rama Krishna Reddy and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Mohammed Jabir Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana