The High Court of Telangana granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition seeking remedy for inaction under the Raithu Bandhu scheme and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAYOF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT TITIO O:3 F20
Between:
Kanna Madhav Rao,S/o.Veeranna,CasteHindu, aged-about -50 years' Occ liiir'"lit,jlt, ili,. ri"ii! "ijug""ia;Jnin Mandal, NizamabadDistrict' r's'
...WRIT PETITIONERS
AND
RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the cir"rr"t-"-n""s.tut"din the affidavit filed therewith'the HighCourt maybe pleased to issue anappropriate writ, order, or directions more particularly onein lhe.nature oJ wiit ot un11oauus,dectarini ihe inaction on the partof respondentNo.4 and5 in not consideringthe represen6tionto stopthe cheque-to encash anddirect the i";;ild* i.e.res"pondentno.5 herein take back cheque fromthe RespondentNos iO to iZ ana toimplement the court order and mutate the land as per court decree -articte ,^ii"L"r in"eniryin New Pattedar PassBook be declaredas illegal'arbitrary 14 and 300-Aof Constitutionof lndiaand ,.i ."^i*w t" frori.ion ot tne
also contraryto guidelinesof Telangana GovernmentRiathu Bandu Scheme' the oelitioner also sort followingrelief; (i) Direct the respondentNos' 1-6 more "5 and 6 to iake back the cheque/cheque amount and lpJiii""irv-i"tp"no"nir'1o". i;rth;; ;;i to issuenew cheques to the respondent Nos 10-12 under Raithu Bandhu scheme nowonwardsand keep the cheque amounttill pendencyof b"rrt pJrg lt "lih; Bodhan. fi"al(ii) decreeDirect in the o.S. respondents No. 16i of 2008 on the to disburse^the cheque amounl file of JuniorcivllJudgeby- "ir.gln" i;;i"; cirit Judgicourtirag;Lntana Decree'passed at Bodhan under Telangana in o S No covernment Raithu 163 of 2008 on the Bandhufile of S;h;;, atterp-assingof final decree in the abovesuit (iii) Direct therespondent N;;. 1-d more'specifically respondentNos 5 and6 to mutatedthe name in the r"u"nr" t"aorO "hdal.o iisuing new pattedar pass bookand title deed and cheque ,r p"i iinrrdecree passed in d.S.t"to.163 of 2008 on the file of Junior Civil Judge Court at Bodhan.
IAN O: 1 OF2018
PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin tne aftioaviftiteO in support of the petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto interim iii.ii"n ^"t to issue chequeichequeamount under,,Raithu Bandhu scheme"to the i""pono""i flo".tO-r z tilt iinal decree passed in O S No1 63 of 2008 on the file of Lrrii", ci"ii Judgecourt at Bodhanand further directedto take backthe cheque amount andt<ee-ptne cheque amount till pendency of passing of the final decreein oS.N",l63of2003ont.hefileofJuniorCivilJudgeCoUrtatBodhanti|lpending disposal ofthe abovewrit petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIG.DINESH PATIL
Counsel for theRespondentNo.1: GP FORAGRICULTURE
Counsel for theRespondentNos.2to 6 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe RespondentNos.7 to 12 : NONEAPPEARED
The Court madethe followingOROER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
wRtT PETITION NO.35479 0 F 2018
ORDER:
Mr. G, Dinesh Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks
permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.
Permission is accorded.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated.
Miscellaneous applications, iI any, pending shall stand
dismissed.
SD/-K.SREERAMAMURTHY ASSISTANT EGISTRAR
I
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
a Oire-CC io Snt.O.OtNeSHPATIL,Advocate [OPUC]
SA BS
AJT
HIGH COURT
DATED:1510212022
ORDER
tlL S T4 rt:
0 3 r,ilil 202 ()
o
\ * .J
WP.No.35479 of 2018
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
r"w
Au
t
Kanna Madhav Rao and 6 others
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Agricultural Department
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department
The District Collector and District Magistrate, Nizamabad
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bodhan
The Thasildar, Bodhan Mandal
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
