Dismissed

The Govt of Ap., Health,Medical and Family Welfare Dept., and 2 v. S.Puspaneela,Nalgonda District and 2 Others

Telangana HC21 Oct 2022WP/31489/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses Writ Petition No. 31489 of 2012 filed by the Government of A.P. The court held that the petition was earlier dismissed for failure to comply with a docket order dated 24.03.2015, after which no further steps were taken.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with no costs awarded.

What the court decided

The Govt of Ap., Health,Medical and Family… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 31489 OF 2012

¶6

Between:

¶7

The Government of A.P. reptn., Principal Secretary, to Government Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-

¶8

The Commissioner of Public Health & Family Welfare, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad.

¶9

The District Medical and Health Officer, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda.

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

S.Puspanella, W/o. Kotaiah, Occ: Un-employee, R/o Miryalaguda Village and Mandal Nalgonda District.

¶13

R.Prasanna, W/o Srinivas Reddy, Occ: Unemployee R/o Nereducherla Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District

¶14

T.Vanamma, Wo Anji Reddy, Occ: Unemployee Fi/o Chivemia Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with orders dated 25-08-2011 in O.A.No.646B/2008 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and to quash or set aside the same by holding as erroneous and contrary to law.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 40173 OF 2012)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders dated 25-08-2011 in O.A. No.6468/2008 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. Hyderabad pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶21

¶22

AND

¶23

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶24

W.P.No.31489 OF 2012

¶25

ORDER: (Per I{o n'ble Sri lustice Abhinand Kumar Shauili)

¶26

tff4ren the matter is taken up for hearing, it is noticed that the writ

¶27

petition was dismissed for non-compliance of the docket order dated

¶28

24.03.2015 and thereaftet no steps were taken to comply with the said

¶29

doctet order.

¶30

In view of t}e same, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶31

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶32

SD/-M.MANJULA DEPUTY REGIST'RAR

¶33

,/ //TRUE COPYII v' SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

'1 . Two CCs to GP for Services l, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 2. Two CD Copies

¶36

One Spare Copy

\sw il

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2111012022

ORDER

WP.No.31489 of 2012

S-l.Are C
'I
?2 ttB ?tB i
,'. r - ,-,
a---- --:,r.,

¶45

WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED NO COSTS.

¶46

@
0A
rr\r\D

The Govt of Ap., Health,Medical and Family Welfare Dept., and 2 v. S.Puspaneela,Nalgonda District and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

The Govt of Ap., Health,Medical and Family Welfare Dept., and 2 v. S.Puspaneela,Nalgonda District and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Y.Sreenivasa Rddy and 2 Ors. Vs Chief Secy. Govt of Ap. Hyd and 8 Ors.

B. Nageswara Rao, Vs Union of India, rep by its Secretary

A.P.S.R.T.C., Vs D.Srinivas

M. Narsimhulu, Medak Dist. Vs the High Court of A.P. Hyd. and Another

J.Ashok Kumar, Hyd. Vs Syed Walliullah, Hyd and 6 Others

The Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs J. Ramulu