The Court dismissed the Writ Petition for default and non-prosecution as none appeared during the hearing despite it being listed. Petitioners were granted liberty to file a fresh case.
Liberty granted to file a fresh case if the cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.19551 of 2002
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appears for the petitioner(s) in spite of the fact that the writ petition is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. This Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for default and non-prosecution of the case.
liberty is given to the petitioners to file a fresh case, if the cause survives. There shall be no order as to costs.
any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
______________________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, J Date: 20.10.2022 KL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
