Disposed

Smt. Manju Bhargavi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Apr 2022WP/17086/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the legality of an allotment decision in a teaching cadre. Following earlier similar orders, the court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Educational Officer, who was ordered to consider and decide within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit representation to Respondent No. 2; Respondent directed to consider and pass orders within four weeks.

Smt. Manju Bhargavi Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 17086 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. IVanju Bhargavi, w/o A.Narender Goud Mahabubnagar Emp.l.D 1740032. Deignation: SA Physical Science Erstwile : Mahabubnagar Allotted New Local Cadre: Mahabubnagar Date ofAppeal. 27 -12-2021

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, lts rep. by Principal Secretary Telangana Education Depadment, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶12

The District Educational Officer Head of the Department, IVlahabubnagar Dist.

¶13

The District Collector, Mahabubnagar District.

¶14

..,RESPONDENTS.

¶15

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any order or direction writ or writs more particularly on in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the allotment vide Proc.No.ES/SC/MA/MBNR/SCAS/0302 Date. 231 1212021 according to G.O.Ms. No. 317 of GA(SPF) Dept. Dated 06112121, without considering the Memo No.1655/SPF-112021-6 on 22-12-2O21 on spouse ground to the petitioner request location or the considering the seniority, is illegal, arbitrary and also violation of the principles of natural^justice in the interest of^justice and equity.

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed_ in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to post the petitioner in Ranga Reddy area on spouse

¶18

groundaSperMemoNo.l6S5/SPF-1t2o21.6on22ll2t2o21bypassingorderon appeal Dt.^{27 t12l2O21and also on the representation made by the petitioner to} the respondent,^{pending disposalof the writ petition'}

¶19

Gounsel^{for the Petitioner: SRI' PRUDHVIRAJ MUDUNURI}

¶20

Counsel^{for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION-}

¶21

The Court^{made the following: ORDER}

¶22

¶23

1 (

¶24

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.1 7086 0F 2022

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Heard Mr. M.^prudhvi Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Govemment pleader for Service_I, and perused the material on record.

¶28

-^{. Leamed counsel for both sides report that in similar} circumstances, this Court passed orders in W.p. No.366gg of 2O2l and batch dated 28.12.2021 and, in terms thereof, this writ petition may be disposed of.

¶29

Therefore, recording the aforesaid submission of the leamed counsel on either side, following the order in W.p. No.366gg of 2021 and batch dated 28.12.2021, in terms thereof, this writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to submit a representation to respondent No.2 - the District Educational Officer, Head of the Department, Mahabubnagar District, and on receipt of such representation, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, in

¶30

)

¶31

accordance with 1aw, within a period of four' (4) weeks from the

¶32

date of receipt of a copy of this order. The ordcr in W.P. No.366U8 of 2021 and batch dated 28.12.2021 shall folm part ol the lecord.

¶33

No order as to costs.

¶34

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendi:.rg

¶35

in the writ petition stand closed.

¶36

SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'

secrroJKrrcen

To,

The Principal Secretary, Telangana Education Department, Telangana Secretariat, State of Telangana, Hyderabad

¶41

The District Educational Officer Head of the Department, Mahabubnagar Dist. 2 The District Collector, Mahabubnagar District.

¶42

One CC to SRl. PRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI, Advocate. [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION , High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶43

Two CD Copies

¶44

One Spare Copy

SB SB

HIGH COURT

DATED:0610412022

ORDER

WP.No.17086 of 2022

/,
{</
.,
i)
s
ii,
a.r:
iIc <br><br>J hl9l r,1

¶51

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.

Smt. Manju Bhargavi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Manju Bhargavi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Ravinder Vs The State of Telangana

Yerram Uttam Vs The State of Telangana

Gaddam Satya Goud Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Yadavalli Anjali , Anjamma and another Vs The State of Telangana and 8 others

Mutteni Lingaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Shahanaz Begum Vs The District Educational Officer and 5 others