The High Court permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a suspension order, as the petitioner had already been reinstated into service, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1671 OF 2022
Between:
Mr. A. Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Somaiah, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Senior Assistant, H. No. 4-9-814, plot No. 78, Lecturers Colony, Tyagaraj Nagar, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad 501 505.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a. Declaring that the Proceedings no. Gl18l2021dated 29-09-2021 ot the 3rd Respondent as illegal arbitrary and discriminatory violating Article 14, 16, 300A of constitution of lndia. Therefore the said proceedings are liable to be set aside b. Declare the petitioner is entitle to be reinstated in to service as Senior Assistant, SRO, Bhongiri of Nalgonda District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in ,;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no 3 to continue the petitioner as Senior Assistant, S R O, Bhongiri, Nalgonda District by suspending the operation of impugned proceedings no G1181202'l dated 29.09.2021pending disposal of Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Pe,itioner: Mr. MOHAMMED ABDUL IiASHEED Counsel for the Re:,ipondents: GP FOR SERVICES ll
The Court made thr: following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DE\IT
W.P.No. L67l OF 2o22
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dated 13.07.2022 belore the Registry seeking permission of this Court to n'ithdraw the present writ petition stating that the present writ petition challenging the suspension order has become infructuous as the petitioner herein has been reinstated into service.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions, il any, pending in this
/
Writ Petition, shall standqlosed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. K.SREERAMAMURTY ASSISTAN REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
$
1
HIGH COUR
DATED:1410t 12022
ORDER
WP.No.1671 of 2022
2 X sEP 7tl2
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \2/ '*^
Mr. A. Venkateshwarlu
State of Telangana, rep. by Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department
Commissioner and Inspector General Registration and Stamps
Deputy Inspector General, Stamps and Registration
District Registrar, Nalgonda
Sub Registrar, Bhongiri
P.Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
