Dismissed

Gurram Rajitha Devi v. The Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education

Telangana HC13 Jul 2022WP/12980/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana granted permission to withdraw a writ petition and a civil remedy petition challenging government allotment orders on spouse grounds. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn and miscellaneous applications were closed.

Gurram Rajitha Devi Vs The Commissioner and… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 12980 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Gurram Rajitha Devi, Wo. Challa Prabhakar Reddy, aged about 41^years, Assistant Profssor in Computer Science, Government Degree College, siddipet' siddipet District

¶9

...pETrroNER

¶10

AND

¶11

The Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education, Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶12

State of Telangana, Represented by lts Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department' secretariat' Hyderabad

¶13

...RES'.NDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filecj therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, orCer or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proc.No. EHlCOlZVllMllLElN/0007, dated 27 12-2021 and its. conseqriential Proc.No. EH/CO/M|ILE|N/0002, dated 9-1-2012 issued by the l st respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 ot lhe Constitution of lndia besides being contraly to the guidelines issued by the Government for allocation of wife and husband who are Government employees at the same place or nearby place and consequently set-aside the same and hold that the petitioner is entitled for re-allotment to Multi Zone llon spouse grounds urith all consequential and attendant benefits.

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for allotting to Multi Zone ll on spouse grounds by suspending the operation of the impugned Proc.No. EH|CO|ZVI|MI/LEIN/0007, daled 27-12-2021 and its consequentiat Proc.No. EH/CO/M|/LEIN/0002, dated 9-i-2012 issued by the 1st respondent, pendng disposal of the above writ petition.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. NARASIMHA

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI

¶22

tr.!. irtq.!2980 ef 292?

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Thc learned counscl for thc pctitioncr submitted a letter dal.ed 08.O7 .2O22 stating l.hat thc rcsponde nts have considered the casc of the pctitioncr on spousc grounds, as such he seeks

¶25

permission from this Court. to withdrau. the writ petition.

¶26

l)ermission is accordcd and this writ pctition is dismissed

¶27

as withdrawn. No ordcr as lo oosts.

¶28

Miscellancous applic:rtions, iI any, pcnding, shall stand

¶29

closed.

¶30

SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR^RAO ASSISTANT REG-ISTRAR //TRUE COPY'/ /TfrL

¶31

¶32

SECTIOMOFFICER

¶33

To,'1. One CC to Sri P. Narasimha, Advocate [OPUC]

¶34

i. iil CCs to Gp for^{Higher Eciucation,High Court for the State of Telangana} at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶35

Two CD Copies

¶36

One Spare^CoPY

GJP ,DV--

\ \

HIGH COURT DAf ED:131O712022

ORDER

[? SE? 'i..111

WP.No.12980 of 2022

DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶45

U in^(r lD^lglt'"

Gurram Rajitha Devi v. The Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurram Rajitha Devi v. The Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uckoo Srinivasa Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Banoth Raja and another Vs The District Collector and 4 others

R. Sunitha Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Smt. K. Srilaxmi Vs The Chief General Manager and 6 others

G. Vivekananda Vs The State of Telangna And 3 Others

T. Venkateswara Rao Vs Telangana State Power Generation Corporation