During an interim hearing in a writ petition alleging illegal allotment of an appointment, the court granted the petitioner permission to withdraw the petition. The writ petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
WR|T PETITION NO: 11060 OF 2022
Between:
Dr.B.Bixmaiah, S/o. Somaiah, Aged 59 Years, Working as Lecturer in Chemistry, (Assistant Professor of Chemistry), Government Degree College, Gambhiraopet, Gambhiraopet Mandal, Rajanna Siricilla District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that a) The action of the respondents in allotting the petitioner to Rajanna Siricilla District vide proceedings No. EHlCOlZ}lllMllLElN/0046 daled 2711212021 is illegal and arbitrary violating article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of lndia. b) Declare that the action of the respondents in not considering and disposing of the application of the petitioner dated 2711212021 is illegal and arbitrary.
IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stared in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the application filed by the petitioner daled 27.12.202't, pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 & 4: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATTON
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: Gp FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
W.P.No.11060 OF 2022
ORDDR:
Learned counsel for the petitioner hled a letter dated 11.07.2022 before the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition stating tJlat the respondents are considering the appeal filed by the petitioner as per the interim directions of this case.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this
Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/-P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGIS,TRAR /ffRUE COPY// sEcfloN 6prtcEn
-f
To,
'1. One CC to SRI SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU, Advocate IOPUC]
l \
I
HIGH COURT DATED:14tTtt2O22
ORDER
WP.No.11060 of 2022
l ttE S Irt
()C) 1O AUE zr1t Z
C)
'j]
''i:
1.,iia
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WTHDRAWN WTHOUT COSTS
fln
n{
1o
Ii
Dr. B. Bixmaiah
The State of Telangana
P. MADHAVI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
