Donepudi Nageshwara Rao, Visakhapatnam Dist v. D. Ramachandra Reddy, Hyd and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD…
THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF I,4ARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHIBAND KUMAR SHAVILI
lA No.3 OF 2017 (WAMP No.2723 OF 2017). lA No.4 OF 2017 (WAMP No.2724 OF 2017) ln/and WRIT APPEAL NO:1463 of 2017
Common CT in WA & both WAMPs
Between:
Donepudi Nageshwara Rao, S/o. Adi Narayana, Aged about 74 yearc, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No.8-6-4215. lvlagad a Empire, Flat No.81, Visakhapatnam - 53001 7.
...Appe lla nUPetitio ne r
AND
...Respondents/Respondents
lA No.3 OF 2017(WAMP No.2723 OF 2017),
Petition under Section 151 of CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the aifidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file appeal against the order of the learned Judge passed in WP No.1186412017 dated 06-04-2017, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.
fA No.4 OF 2017(WAMP No.2724 OF 2017 ),
Petition under Section 151 of CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (138) days in filing the appeal against the order of the Judge passed in WP No.1 186412017 dated 06-04-2017.
WA No.1463 of 2017
Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 06-04-20'1 7 in WP No. 1 1 864 of 2017 , on the file of the High Court.
Counsel for the Petitioner (in WA & both WAMPs): SRI O.MANOHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1(in WA & both WAMPs): SRI C.NARENDER Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3(in WA & both WAMPs): GP FOR REVENUE
The Court delivered thi following: COMMON JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE THECHIEF JUSTICESATISH CHANDRASHARMA
AND
THE HON' BLE SRIJUSTIC E ABHINAND KUMARS
Nos.3 o
.No.2 t 2017 f WAM 724 77 in/and WRIT APPEALNo.14630r20L7
COMMON JUDGMENT (Pet the Hon ble the Chief JusiceSdtish ClendruShano)
Learned counselfor the appellantis fair enough in informing
this Court thatthe present writ appeal has becomeinfructuous'
Resultantly, the writappeal and the interlocutory
applications standdisposed of as infructuous'
Pending miscellaneousapplications,if any, shallstand
closed. There Shallbe no orderas to costs'
SD/. CH .VENKATESWARULU DEPUTYREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY'
- t,-.'
SECTIONOFFICER
To 1. rwo CCsto the-GPfor Revenue',Hrsl;:iJt8tllSlStateof relansana [oUT] 2. One CCto Sri O.lr'4anohart' 5;; 6; ii5ri c t'larenoer, AdvdcatetoPUCl
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2910312022
t >o
.'3
$q I\ 1t11
oo
t9
-,( !) .^-^.-.
COMMON JUDGMENT
lA No.3 OF 2017 (WAMP No.2723 OF 20171, lA No.4 OF 2017 (WAMP No.2724 OF 20171 ln/and
WRIT APPEAL NO:1463 of 2017
DISPOSING THE WAMPs & WA AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
5D
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to reverse the objection raised by the Special Cell (SC) in the appeal.
Donepudi Nageshwara Rao
D. Ramachandra Reddy
State of Telangana
Consultant of Violence Fraud (COVAF)
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court