Disposed

Namburi Trinada Karuna Kumar,Khammam Dist v. the Mandal Revenue Officer, and 4 Others

Telangana HC28 Mar 2022WA/1748/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order disposed of a writ appeal regarding a partition matter. The court acknowledged the existence of an alternative partition suit remedy but allowed the appeal, granting the appellant liberty to file a partition suit pending in any manner.

What did the court decide?

A liberty was granted to the appellant to file a partition suit.

Namburi Trinada Karuna Kumar,Khammam Dist Vs the Mandal Revenue… — Partition | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

MONDAY ,THE^{TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

HONOURABLE^{THE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA} AND THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI}

¶5

WRIT APPE^{AL NO: 1748 0F 2008}

¶6

Writ Appeal^{under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal pefeed agaist the} ode dated^{29.01.2008in rrip.No.-rzs78 of 2005 dt 29-10-2008on the file of the} High Court.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Namburi Trinada^{Karuna Kumq1, S/o SubbaRao' Agriculturerlo} -ano tl4andal' Kham mam District' ij;il;ft ,d;;Vttase

¶9

...APPELLANT/PETITIONE

¶10

AND

¶11

The Mandal^{Revenue Officer, DummugudemMandal' Khammam District'}

¶12

Sri Namburi^{Veerabhadra Rao, q/q (late) SatyanarayanaMurthy' r/o} ' 6r;;6;iem Virirs; ana Mandal, Khammam District'

¶13

Smt.Pendvala^{Kusumamba,, w/o-(late) DhanaMurthy' r/o Dummugudem} - Viilige anb Mandal, Khammam District'

¶14

Smt.Velpuri^{Laxmi,, r/o DummugudemVillage and Mandal' Khmmam District'}

¶15

The Chief^{Commissioner of Land Administration' A'P} 'Hyderabad'

¶16

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶17

Counsel for the^{Appellant:SRl' P V RAMANA}

¶18

Counsel for^{the Respondent Nos'1 & 5: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶19

Counsel for^{the Respondent Nos' 2 to 4: SRI'R KAMESWARRAO}

¶20

The Court delivered^{the following:}

¶21

¶22

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTI CE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶23

AND

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶25

WRIT APPEAL No. 1748 of 2008

¶26

JUDGMENT: U,er the t ton'ble the ChieI JustLce Sattsh Cha clra Shc,r.rte)

¶27

Learned counsel for the appellant is fair enough in

¶28

stating before this Court that the appellant is certainly having an alternative remedy to lile a partition suit anci he

¶29

prays for a liberty to the appellant to file a partition suit.

¶30

The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of with the

¶31

aforesaid liberty.

¶32

The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

¶33

stand closed. There shall be order as to costs.

¶34

"'*',t+HIt?S'[iR / //TRUE COPY' 1 /

¶35

SECTION OFFICER

¶36

To,

¶37

The Mandal^{RevenueOfficer, DummugudemMandal' Khammam District'}

¶38

Z. The Cfrief^{Commissioner of Land Administration'A'P} 'Hyderabad'

¶39

g. On" CC to Sri. P V Ramana Advocate tOPUCI

¶40

O"" CC to^{Sri.R. Kameswar Rao, Advocate IOPUCI}

¶41

Two ccs to^{GPror Revenue, High court fortheStateof Telangana [oUT]}

¶42

Two CD^CoPies.

¶43

One Sp<ve^coTy

PN/

cts

HIGH COURT

DATED:2810312022

E S TA
1
t
+
o rv
1 B l'1 hl ?022 o
C)
t'/
{.
* o 6ls pATc

¶49

JUDGMENT

¶50

WA.No.1748^{of 2008}

¶51

Disposing of the^WA Without costs.

¶52

AcvY61

Namburi Trinada Karuna Kumar,Khammam Dist v. the Mandal Revenue Officer, and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Namburi Trinada Karuna Kumar,Khammam Dist v. the Mandal Revenue Officer, and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Telangana State Road Transport Corporation Vs G.Sayanna, W.200519, Driver/ Shramik

Shakeel Islam Khan, Hyderabad Vs Dist Collector, Hyderabad Dist and Another

The Senior Divisional Manager, Vs L. Bheema

B.Kanakaiah, Vs The Secretary to Govt of A.P.

Sri. D. Ramalingam and 2 others Vs Mekala Mallesh and another

SpandanaSphoorty Financial Limited Vs Iq Technologies and Another