Allowed

Sri. D. Ramalingam and 2 others v. Mekala Mallesh and another

Telangana HC28 Mar 2022CA/19/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of a contempt appeal lodged under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act. The Court set aside the order dated 28.02.2020 passed in Contempt Case No. 2926 of 2018, having noted the main writ petition was already decided.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 28.02.2020 in C.C. No. 2926 of 2018 was set aside. Pending miscellaneous applications were closed.

Sri. D. Ramalingam and 2 others Vs Mekala Mallesh and… — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY .THE TWENTY^{EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH}

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE^{THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANORA SHARMA} AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI}

¶7

CONTEMP^{T APPEAL NO 119 0F 2020}

¶8

Contempt Appeal^{UnderSection 19 of Contemptof Courts Act} against the order^{aateaid'oz-2020 in c.C. No. 2926of 2018in W'P' No' 7298 of} 2018 on the file of^{the High Court}

¶9

Betwee n:

¶10

1 . Sri. D. Ramalingam^{Divisional Forestofficer, Mancherial Division, Mancherial} District (Adilabad^District).

¶11

Sri. viiava Kumar sahal,^{Forest Range officer, BellampallyRange,}

¶12

Aellampaity Mancherial District (Adilabad District)'

¶13

Sri. Satish Kumar,^{Deputy RangeOfficer,} lncthalS9^{Beat Officer of Akinapally'} - aeirampattv Range, Mbniherialbistrict (Adilabad District)'

¶14

'..APPELLANTS^{/ ResPondents}

¶15

AND

¶16

1 Mekala Mallesh^{S/o. Odelu} ,^{Aged about39 years,OccBusiness'Fl/o} 6'rirp.jprrrv ;itiug"-r;o^{tr,lanoat,J"ayashankarBhupalpally District(erstwhile} Warangal District).

¶17

2 IVekala Rajitha, Wio^{Mekala Mallesh Aged about 35.years, Occ Housewife'} nlo. Af'rrpJfprfiy^{village and mandal. Jayashankar Bhupalpally District} (erstwhile Warangal District) ...ReSPOruOeruTS/^Petitioners

¶18

IA NO: 1 0F²⁰²⁰

¶19

Application^{under Section151 CPC prayino that in the circumstances} "mav be pleased to Suspend stated^{in the accompanv,ni]tjio"uit'int ulgn court} j'd;j" o,it& :l 28'02'2020 in C C No^{2e26 of} the orders ibi ii"^{w.p.N of o.izsa Learned ot zot"a' penoing disposal} "'igt^{of the Appeal'}

¶20

Counsel^{for the Appellant: GOVT' PLEADER GP FOR FORESTS (TG)}

¶21

Counsel^{fortheRespondents:SRI ' A' PRABHAKARRAO}

¶22

The Court^{delivered the following: Judgment}

¶23

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHAND RA SHARMA AND

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶25

CONTEMPT APPEAL No,19 of2O2O

¶26

JUDGMENT: eer the Hon'bLe the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)

¶27

Learned counsel for the parties have fairly stated before this Court that the main writ perition i.e., W.P.No.7298 of 2018 has already been disposed of on O2.O3.2O22. It has also been prayed that the order passed in the Contempt Case i.e., C.C.No.2926 of 2018 be set aside.

¶28

Learned counsel lor the respondents is also fair enourgh in accepting the aforesaid contention made by the learned counsei for the appellants.

¶29

The Contempr Appeal is accordingly disposed of and the order passed in C.C.No.2926 ol 2018, dated 2g.02.2020, is hereby set aside.

¶30

The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶31

¶32

¶33

SD/.8,S. IRANJEEVI JOIN EGISTRA //TRUE COPYII

¶34

sEcTtoN OFFTCER

¶35

l Sri D Ramarinoam Divisionar Forest officer, Mancheriar Division, Mancherial District (Adilaba? District;.

¶36

' 31i,, Jil3)1i r:HlT.,:B[1;.i., ?i!:,To,Tflgi,^i.frr,.u,,^Be,ampa,y Ranse,

¶37

' SliifXSiX,i$* ",,i3Hlrr5?ll'f,.?,[i?l.itlfJ's,S;s,,)oo,*,or^Akinapa,,y

¶38

Two CCs to GOVT. PLEADqR .ci F_OR FORESTS , High Court for the state of Tetangana at HyderabadibUT]'' "''-"

¶39

One CC to SRt. A. PRABHAKAR RAO, Advocate tOpUCl

¶40

Two CD Copies

\ I,l

HIGH^COURT

DATED:2810312022

,1 H f- 16:
o 12 AFs 2t3
* *

¶45

JUDGMENT

¶46

CONTEMPT^{APPEAL No'19of 2020}

¶47

DISPOSING OF^{THE CONTEMPTAPPEAL}

¶48

-\b ) ^^-
YrY': -
' \X

Sri. D. Ramalingam and 2 others v. Mekala Mallesh and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. D. Ramalingam and 2 others v. Mekala Mallesh and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Telangana State Road Transport Corporation Vs G.Sayanna, W.200519, Driver/ Shramik

Shakeel Islam Khan, Hyderabad Vs Dist Collector, Hyderabad Dist and Another

The Senior Divisional Manager, Vs L. Bheema

B.Kanakaiah, Vs The Secretary to Govt of A.P.

Namburi Trinada Karuna Kumar,Khammam Dist Vs the Mandal Revenue Officer, and 4 Others

SpandanaSphoorty Financial Limited Vs Iq Technologies and Another