The Family Court disallowed these appeals seeking appointment of a guardian and custody of the minor Kum Sai Priya, holding that the cause of action ceased to exist because the child had attained the age of majority at the time of the hearing.
Both Family Court Appeals are disposed of; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.78 of 2013 and 263 of 2011
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Dr.SA,J)
Since the parties and the issue involved in both the appeals is one and the same, they are being heard together and disposed of by way of this common order.
2
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these two appeals stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
___________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI , J
Date: 28.03.2022 YVL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeal for appointment of guardian and custody of a minor child can be disposed of if the intended ward has already attained the age of majority.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Appellant-Respondent No.2
Respondents No.1 and 2-Petitioners
SHAMEEM AKTHER
JUVVADI SRIDEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
