This court allowed an application to withdraw the Family Court Appeal based on a compromise between parties and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal is accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.245 OF 2013
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Dr.SA,J)
Learned counsel for the appellant is present and submitted that both parties have compromised the subject matter of the appeal outside the Court and the appellant does not want to proceed with the appeal and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal
stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
___________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI , J
Date: 28.03.2022
YVL
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.245 OF 2013
Date:28.03.2022
YVL
Dr. Shameem Akther
Juvvadi Sridevi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
