Allowed

Smt. Obilisetty Nagamani v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC25 Mar 2022WP/2372/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed the writ petition filed by a mother seeking release of her daughter who was detained under an administrative order. The court set aside the impugned detention order and the consequential confirmation order, directing release of the detainee.

What did the court decide?

The detention order and consequential confirmation order were set aside. The detainee, Thimmanaboina Padma @ Latha, was directed to be set at liberty forthwith.

Smt. Obilisetty Nagamani Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, IHE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO: 2372 OF 2022

¶5

Betwee n:

¶6

Smt. Obilisetty Nagamani, W/o. Appa Rao, aged 66^{years Occ. House wife,} Rio. H No. 1-1 01 lVeraka Veedhi, Ulimeswaram Peddapuram^{l,4andal,East} Godavari District

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

AND

¶9

The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home^Department Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶10

The Director General of Police, Telangana State, DGP Office^Lakdikapool, Hyderabad

¶11

The Chief Secretary, to the Government State of^{Telangana, Home} Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶12

The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda, Rachakonda

¶13

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Malkajgiri^{Division, Rachakonda}

¶14

lnspector of Police, Nacharam Police Station,^Rachakonda

¶15

The Superintendent of Police, Chenchalguda Central^{Prison, Chenchalguda} HYderabad

¶16

...RESP.NDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,} the^{High Court maybe} pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more^particularly one in the nature^of Writ of Habeas Corpus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent^{in passing the} GO Rt No. 2864 dt. 24.12.2021 basing on^{the Detention Order videRc No. 125lPD} Ce||/CCRB/RCKO12121 dated 11.10.2021^passed by^{the 4th respondent to} detention her daughter namely Thimmanaboina^Padma @^{Latha, W/o. Raju, aged} 40 years, into Central Prison, Chenchalguda,^{Hyderabad is illegal, arbitraryand} against the principles of natural^justice by selting^{aside the G.O Rt No.2864} daled 24.12.2021 and consequently^release the^{daughter of the petitioners} forthwith in the interest of^justice.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.NARSING^RAO

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G.MALLA^{REODY, AGP for Homefor} ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶20

It is ordered as follows:

¶21

THE l'ON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER AND THE H )N'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI

¶22

,VRIT PETITION o.2372 OF 2022

¶23

VAN E(^,RDER: (Per Hon'ble Dr.SA,l )

¶24

in th r result, the Writ Petition is alloweC. The impugned d :tention order vide No.125lPD CELL/CCRB/RCKD/ 2021, datec 11.10.2021, passed by the respondent No.4, and the conseq rential confirmation order vide G.O.Rt.N0.2864, General Ad ninistration (Spl. (Law & Order)) Department, dated 24.12.2021,, passed by the Principal Secretary to Governmen, General Administration^{(Spl. (Larv} & Order)) Department, Government of Telangana, are hereby set aside. The resporCents are directed to set the detenue, namely Smt, Thimrranaboina Padma @ Latha, W/o. Raju, at liberty forthwith, i' she is no longer required in any other criminal CASC.

¶25

( Dett iled order follows)

¶26

SD/-L.SIVA^PARVATHI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR L ,TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶27

To, 1 The Principal^{)ecretary'HomeDepartment' State of Telangana'Secretariat'} 2 +X3"J?::[r.^{( ;eneral of Police, Telansana State'DGP officeLakdikapool'} Hyderabad

¶28

¶29

[nt⁾

¶30

r The Chief Secretary'^{to the Government State of TelanganaHome} Deoartment,^{Secretariat'Hyde-raDao.}

¶31

t 4. i;5U;;i;.i;I""''Ii^{Ftl"'" Rachakonda' Rachakonda} Rachakonda I s TheAssistantd:#it:JJ[;i'i1-i'iit".tt't;trajdriDivision'

¶32

, p"il;:' Ni;;aiim^{potice, station Rachakonda} 6. 7 rhe suoerint""ll=,it'J?Etii#,'Cr,"rir,"rgrau tnspector "f^{C",ii..itPrison' Chenchalsuda}

¶33

, ?I0".3t3?"tf,r"t^Bi:tX,y3?,?,?lat'l'd'nn^{court ror the state or reransana} 9. touTlTwo CCs^{to the GP for Hom-e't1.igh Court^for the State of Telangana [OUT]}

¶34

10.one cc^{to SRiiir'jXHsir'rc'nAb' AdvocateloPuc]}

¶35

1'1 .Two^{C D CoPies'}

¶36

12.One^SPareCoPY'

¶37

MRC BS

¶38

HIGH COURT

¶39

DATED:2510312022

¶40

i
Z-Gffi+ )
)!
%
l!
lo
25 l4AR 2022
l,' l.

¶41

ADVANCE ORDER

¶42

WP.No.2372 of 202

¶43

ALLOWING THE V RIT PETITION

¶44

)
At
7
,o ) /4----"-

Smt. Obilisetty Nagamani v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Obilisetty Nagamani v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Shah Jahan Begum Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Sri S.Mahesh Kumar Vs Smt. S.Gayathri

Kalyani Sumalatha Vs The State of Telangana

Ravi Raj Boda Vs Madu Goutam Goud

Smt. Manekar Beju Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Bonathu Snehalatha Vs The State of Telangana