The High Court of Telangana dismissed the civil revision petition as infructuous because the underlying original suit was settled before Lok Adalat, leaving no cause to survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3218l
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 770 OF 2010
Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, again sVaggrieved by the Order dated 1311112009 in 1.A.No.238 of 2009 in O.S.No.2188 of 2006 order of the V Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court) Ranga Reddy District at L.B Nagar.
Between
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 4 TO 6
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDt:NTS/l)E:FE:NDANTS 1 TO 3
l.A. No: 1 oF 20i Q(aEpruE Xp.l_9!!_9_E291Q
Petition un ler Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasr:C to stay all further proceedings in O S.No. 2188 of 2009 on the file of the V Aclditioral Senior Civil Judge, Ranga ReJdy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the F etitioners: SRI O. MANOHAR REDDY
Counsel for the t espondent Nos. 1 to 3: SRI JANARDHAN IiEDDY KOTHA Counsel for the F espondent No.4: M/S V. TULASI REDDY Counsel for the F espondent Nos. 5 & 6: M/S KADALI SRI L,1IMl The Court made I he following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CML REVISION PETITION No.77O of 2O1O
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel on behalf of the revision petitioner and on behalf of respondents. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that the matter in OS No.2188 of 20O6 is settled before l,ok Adalat on 26.06.2022. On verification of the case status information, the said fact is confirmed. Accordingly, while recording the submissions and also considerirrg the case status information, as the Original Suit No.2188 of 2006 is settled before [,ok Adalat and no cause survives, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to the costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall
stands closed.
"iSSBYAilf'-EI.EFRRX / //TRUECOPY// Qb
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 2. J. 4. glEg:flffi 'ffii,$ffir:fif".qF,.itfi;;::1"''"'"' 6 6. Two CDCoPies KKS w-
t
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 t1012022
ORDER
CRP.No.77(t of 2010
.1-----
41,* ttte
tr
1e tN 2w
DISMISSIN(iTT{E CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
er.t((6 w- i\">
N. Shankar Goud
N. Janabai
N. Krishna Goud
Sampath Srinivasa Rao
Sampath Prasada Rao
Sampath Pradeep Kumar
A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
