The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as infructuous and held that no cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1321E l
t<br>
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3000 OF 2010
Petition under A(icle 227 o'f the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 03.05.2010 in LA.No.86 of 2010 in O.S.No.7 o'f 2010 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Huzurnagar, Natgonda District.
Between:
lnd ira Anadha Vruddashramam, Rep.by Nagireddy Vijayamma,W/o.l,4anga Reddy Fl/o. M ukumalats PuramPresident Village, Munagala IVlandal, Nalgonda District.
...PETITION ER/PETITIONER
AND
Dr. Baddigam Rama Krishna Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, aged 69 years, Occ Medical Profession Fl/o. Kodad Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201O(CRPMP. NO: 3992 OF 2010
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuant to the order passed in O.S.No.7 of 2010 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Huzurnagar pending orders in the Revision Petition and pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI YOGESH THULJAPURKAR FOR
SRI K. NARASIMHACHARI
Gounsel forthe Respondent: SRI V. RAGHU
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BL ' SRI JUSTIC]E A.VENKATESHIVAIi:A IIEDDY CIVIT F.EVISION PETITION No.3OOO of 20 ltr)
ORDER:
Flearcl S ri. Y,rgcs hTlr lj:r pu rk:rr, Advocatr-' rn bchalf ol Sri.l(.N,,rrsirnht t:har-i, lezrrrrcd colrnsel for the revisior 1.,eti ioner. On instrr,rctionr . it is subrnittt'd bv rhe learned cor-lnrie that the tenantr:d prem s( s is vircltccl and no cause :lulvj!er.. While recording the s.tirri- issi,rns madc, this Civil Revision F'etition is dismissr:d :ts n Irtir'tuorrs irr nL) caus,: survives. Irr the circumstanccs rf thc clrsc'. tl:ere shall be no orrler €ls 1o the costs. llisccll:r i. rLrs ai..l.lications, if any pending, stra I s,ands closcd.
TiD/.K.SAILESHI DEOUN' REGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
I
To
SE(:I'lOt'lOFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2011012022
ORDER
CRP.No.3000 of 201)
a
{ He s T.q 7'I
l|"o i
/, I
,i: ,i
lr l: a ,- 1t J [ll 'tI (.; I
9,.
\ :
s arE .
::::
):
DISMISSING THE C IVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
D>
&<br>@
I_>
\-
19-
Indira Anadha Vruddashramam, Rep.by Nagireddy Vijayamma
Dr. Baddigam Rama Krishna Reddy
A. Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
