The High Court of Telangana, on finding that no cause survived in the underlying injunction application, dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 and Order 39 CPC as infructuous without costs.
The Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded. Miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
|32181
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL EVISION PET ITION NO: 5437 O F 2009
Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, against/aggrieved by the Orderdated 01-'10-2009 passed in 1.A.No.346 of 2009 in O.p.No. 61 of 2009 on the file of the Court of A.P. Cooperative Tribunal at Hyderabad.
Between:
Rep. by their GPA Holder Sri Ch.Bhopal Goud, S/o. Late Ayodhya, aged 58 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Flat No. 302, Odean Enclave, Domalguda,
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS No.9 to 16
AND
i :
(Responden No.1, 2 & 11 are not necessary)
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT{; No.1 to 8, 17 & 18
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009t IRPMP. NO: 7420 oF 2009)
Petitiorr unr:r Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CpC prayirg that in the circumstances stat rd in the affidavit filed in support of t re p€tition, the High Court may be plea ;ed to pass orders restraining respond:rrt Nos. 3 to g from assuming the chz-ge and functioning the [\ilanaging ()o rmittee affairs of Respondent l.lo. 2.
Counsel for the Pe itioner: SRI SRINIVAS FOR SRI G. cOpAl.. G()VIND NAIK
Counsel for the Re i;pondent No.1 : SRI CH. DHANAMJAYA
.a
Counsel forthe Re rpondent No.3: SRI B.S. PRASAD
The Court made th, following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARAREDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5437 of 2OO9
ORDER
Heard Sri.Srinrvas, Advocate on behalf of Mr.G.Gopal Govind Naik. He stated that no cause survives in the Civil Revision Petition and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. While recording the submrssions made by the learned counsel on instructions, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. In the circumstances of the case, there shzill be no order as to the costs. Miscellaneous applications, rf an1, pending, shali stands closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. I. NAGALAKSHMI DEPUW REGISTRAR 6b SECNON OFFICER
To,
stl6W
! I I
HIGH COIJRT
DATED:2lll10'2022
ORDER
/a a1<br>i-r!.. t;, ;.-_ _
(j
1E Ir:t t[?3
i'-
--
GRP.No.5437 ot 2009
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISIONPETITION AS INFRIJCTIUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
,ood,d*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC praying for an injunction remains maintainable.
Mr. G. Gopal Govind Naik
K. Subhash Reddy
Greater Banjara Coop. Housing Society Ltd.
Ch. Santosh Raja
Ch. Sanlosh Raja
A. Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
