The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 for default due to the non-appearance or representation of the revision petitioner. The court found the petitioner was not evincing any interest, treating the matter as infructuous under Section 151 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3218 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1276 OF 2022
Petition under Article 227 oI the Constitution of lndia, order dated'14-03- 2022 passed in lA No 10612021 in CMA.No.27 I 2021 , file of learned ll Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Mancherial
Between:
M/s Santhosh Electricals and Enterprises, Rep. by its Sole Proprietor, G.Prakash, S/o. Malkaiah, aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o Singapur, Naspur Mandal, Mancherial District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFEN DANTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant exparty ad-lnterim lnjunction order restraining the Respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession of the Suit Scheduled Property by suspending the order in l.A.No. 10612022 in CMA.No. 27 ot 2021 on the file of the ll Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Mancherial, pending disposal of the main CRP and pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may be deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. T. KOTESHWARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.'l: GP PLEADER FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondents: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BL ' SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CML REVII;ION PETITION No.1276 of 2022
ORDER:
None appears or beha.lf of the revision petitioner. As per tJ-e proceedings dat:d 12.1O.2022 d,so there was no representation on behalf of the re rision l]etitioner. However, the learned Government Pleader for ApJ,eaJs alrpearing on behalf of the respondent No. I submitted that his m.rtter is connected to several other litigations including the W) No.77'93 of 2O2l and that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, while recording the subrnissiqns made by the learned Govr rnmenl Pleader for Appeals, the matter was directed to be listed todr,v undr'r the caption 'for dismissal' as the revision petitioner is n,rt evincing alty interest. Hence, presence or representation orr behall-of the revision petitioner is felt essential. In tfre absence of arry reprt sentation on behalf oi the revision petitioner, I do not find any merit 10 adjourn the matter. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petit.ion is dismissed for default for non-prosecution. In the circumstaJrces ol the case, there shall be no order as to the costs.
Miscellaneous ap rlicatio:rs, if any pen shall star.ds closed.
SD/. B. SAryAVATHI //TRUE COPY// DEPUWREGISTRAR Ck* / SECTION OFFICER
To,
B M 9$q.
HIGH COURT
DATED:19110111022
ORDER
CRP.No.1276 t>I20122
i
..o
x
s
L.-]
llJ
I
(
iy
c N
<br>7
.-1- l-i5
-*_-:;
DISMISSING THE C:RP FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
.-a^ A'A*
M/s Santhosh Electricals and Enterprises, Rep. by its Sole Proprietor, G.Prakash
The Land Acquisition Officer cum Addl. Collector
The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India
A. Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
