The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Civil Revision petition in default due to non-prosecution. No costs were awarded as the petitioners had no interest since filing.
Civil Revision Petition No.2437 of 2014 dismissed in default for non-prosecution with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3218 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2437 OF 2014
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the docket order dated 03-07-2014 in U/R O.S.No. of 2014 in CF.No.670 of 2014, on the file of Junior Civil Judge at Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District.
Between:
.PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS
AND
M/s Kapil Chit Fund P\r,t. Ltd, R/by its Branch Manager, H.No.21-2-1OBl2,2nd Floor, Near Hanuman Temple, Markendeya Colony, Godavarikhani-505209, Dist: Karimnagar.
...RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENKATESHWAR VARANASI (Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondent: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
i .l
THE HON']ILE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESH[/I:.RIT REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.24il7 of zt'.t14
ORDER:
Nr>nt- rppe ars on behalf of the revisi.rn pe titro rr:r'r.;. Notic,: rvas ordr:reci t,r the respondents. As per thr' piccet:<lir:gs datccl 20.l)q.?,O2). personal noticc u,as also permitteJ. I:lr.rt rro suclr re port is {lle 1. At this stage, it was submitted rLcros; tlrt' Bcnclr rhat Sri.Ven <Ete sh$,ar Varzlnasi, Advocate is n,r nr:,rc. Be thal as it mirr., r ght from 08.08.2014 onu,ards, <ritL,er t.l rcr( \r'as no represcntzrti, ,n or no such report w,ith referen<;e lc rr licr' is lilcd. IjinirLlv on 2.),O.2O22, the matter rvas dilec ed o bc listeci urncle r llrc cEplion 'lor dismissal'as the revision pcIr ioncr is nrrr er.ii.icirrg zlny iiitcrest right from the time of liling ol ht pctition. Accorclinglr,, the Civil Revision Petition is dis;m:ss,r,j iir clefaull Ibr non-pros:cution. [n thc circumstances of th<: r:zt:re. therc shall bc no( rcer as to the costs. Miscellane,tus rr t1:lit'irtions, iI an1. pcnding. shall stands closed.
SD/-K.SAILESHI DI:F UTY EEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// il, SI=CTION OFFICER
To, 1. The Junior Civ I Judge a Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Distric. 2. One CC to Sri ,/enkateshwar Varanasi, Advocate [OPUC
l'
HIGH COURT
DATED:1911(.112022
ORDER
CRP.No.2437 of 2014
'r.l{ F € r.r I
a-1
f(
i[ ,',;:j ?$B z
.o
Iil
4,
.;.'
DISMISSIN(J THE CIVIL REVISION PE'iITI(fN FOR NON F ROSECUTION WITHOUT(]OSTS
a/)
q9-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the civil revision petition for default. Whether costs should be awarded on dismissal.
Dasari Kistaiah and others
M/s Kapil Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd.
A.Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
