Disposed

Abdul Muqeed, Hyderabad., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

Telangana HC21 Jun 2022CRLRC/361/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed two criminal revision cases as abated. The court accepted that the petitioners in both cases had died, rendering the subject matters infructuous, and hence disposed of the petitions without delving into the underlying merits.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Cases CRL.R.C. Nos. 356 and 361 of 2017 closed as abated; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed.

Abdul Muqeed, Hyderabad., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs. — Telangana HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.356 and 361 of 2017

¶6

CRL.R.C.No.356 of 2017

¶7

Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Judgment made in D.V. Appeal No.910 oI 2O15 dated 24.11.2016 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad confirming the order in Crl.MP.No.161 of 20'15 in D.V.C.No.75 of 2014, dated 30-10-2015 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate (Traffic Mobile Court), Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mohd. Ab_dul Basheer, S/o Late IVI.A. Saleem, Aged about 51yrs, Occ: Business R/o H. No.8-3-2 28 I 1 1 1 B, Rahmatnagar, Yousufguda ttyder'abad.

¶10

..PETITIONER/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.2

¶11

AND

¶12

1 T.he State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad.

¶13

,,-RESPONDENT

¶14

2 9mt.^{Sabiya Nahid, S/o Late Abdul Shabeer Aged about 35yrs, Occ:} Housewife R/o H.No.B-3-2281 1 186lParl Rahmatnagar, Youiufguda Hyderabad.

¶15

,..RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶16

Abdul fvluqeed, S/o Late M.A. Saleem, Aged about 42yrs, Occ: Busines R/o H.No.B-3-228l1 186, Rahmatnagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad. (Respondent No.3 is not necessary party for this revision)

¶17

...RESPONDENT/RESPODENT/RESPONDENT No.1

¶18

-^=. --\

¶19

¶20

HONOTIRABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.356 and 361 of 2OL7 ORDER:

¶21

Thesr: Criminal Revision cases a-re filed aggrieved by orders, dated 24.11.2016 in D.V.Appeal Nos.910 and BB7 of 2,Ol5 on the file of II Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hvderabad respectively confirming the orders in Crl.MP.No.l61 o[ 2015 in D.V.C.No.75 of^2014, dated 30.10.2015 on the file of IV Metropolitan^Magistrate (Tr:rffic Mrrbile Court), Hyderabad.

¶22

Lear-ncd counsel for the petitioners submitted^that the petitioncrs in both cases died and^{the subject matters} havc becomc inf'r-uctuous

¶23

Sinc:c thc petitioners died, nothing survives for ad-ludicalion in these revision cases. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Cases are closed as abated

¶24

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶25

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//

¶26

SEC OFFICER

¶27

To, 1 IIg Ilqgitronat.Merropot[an^{Se.ssionsJudge at Hyder:abad.} !. lne^{tv lvletropotitan Magistrqte(Traffic} Mobile Court; at Hyderabad. 3. one CC to Sri^p Naoen-dra necioy, novoCiiJtOFuCl 1. 9n.^{CC to Sri L. Ash"vinixumai,} Aovota-t; ri;nn'ci 5. Two ccs to the^pubric prosecutbr, ugri dolri fir-the state of rerangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies 7. One Spare Copy gbr i$.

¶28

HIGH COURT

¶29

DATED: 2110612022

¶30

L- AuB $ll I
i,' 3[
1t
a.r..:

¶31

COMMON ORDER

¶32

CRLRC.Nos.356 and 361 ot 2017

¶33

CLOSING THE BOTH CRL.R.C AS ABATED

Abdul Muqeed, Hyderabad., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Muqeed, Hyderabad., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Bharat Metal Box Co., Ltd., Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

J.Srinivasa Chary and Anr. Vs State Sho. Uppal Police and Anr.

M.Vijayalakshmi, Vs the State of Ap Rep by Its Pp Hyd., and Another

Shiva Kumar Vs a.Pradeep Kumar

M/S J.R. Exim India, Hyd and Anr. Vs State, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Mohd Abdul Basheer, Hyderabad., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.