The High Court dismissed criminal petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC for non-prosecution, noting that petitioners had no instructions and previous notice returns were unserved.
Criminal petitions (Crl.P.Nos. 4396, 4399, and 4400 of 2010) dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NOS: 4396 4399 AND 4400 0F 2010
CRL,P.N 0.4396 0F 2010:
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RE''.NDENTS
Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 1019 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice pending disposal of the criminal petition.
CRLPMP. NO: 4232 OF 2010
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in CC.No. 1019 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass such other orders/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.
cRL.P.NO.4399 0F 2010
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that n the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 1020 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the lV lr,4etropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice pending disposal of the criminal petition.
CRLPMP. NO: 4233 OF 2010
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in CC.No. 1020 of'1999 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass such other orders/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.
CRL.P.NCr.4400 OF 2010:
Between:
AND
...RE''.NDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, rhe High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 14 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest of justice pending disposal of the criminal petition.
CRLPMP. NO: 4234 OF 2010
Petition under Sectlon 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in CC.No. 14 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass such other orders/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of STi.D.NARSIMULU, (being not present) Advocate for the Petitioners in Cr[.P.s and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 in all Crl.Ps and of Sri Sharad Sanghi, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 in all Crl.Ps.
The Court made the following: ORDER
AND
.,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in tlre Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 1020 ol'1999 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice pending disposal of the criminal petition.
CRLPMP. NO: 4233 OF 2010
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearan,re of the petitioner in CC.No. 1020 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass such other orders/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.
cRL.P.NO.4400 0f: 201 0:
Betvveen:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 14 of 2O0O on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest of justice pending disposal of the criminal petition.
7
CRLPMP. NO: 4234 OF 2010
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in CC.No. 14 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in the interest ofjustice, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass such other orders/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of STi.D.NARSIMULU, (being notpresent) Advocate for the Petitioners in Crl.P.s and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor(TG) on behalf of the RespondentNo.1 in all Crl.Ps and of Sri Sharad Sanghi, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 in all Crl.Ps.
The Court made the following: ORDER
7
I I oN' BLI! SRI JIJS'I' ICE A.SANTIIOS II RT] D I)Y
CRIM I N AL PIITI'IION Nos.4396 4399 and 4400 of20l0
CON{MON ORDER:
Today, none represented the petitioners. Leamed counsel for the second respondent has already submitted arguments. The rnatters are perlaining to the year of 2010. As per lhe docket proceedings. on earlier occasion i.e. on 13.06.2022, learned counsel lbr thc petitioners submitted that he has no instructions lionr the pctitioners inspite of sending notice and filed returned unserved postal covcrs.
Havirrg regard to the said submissions, it appears that the petitioncrs are not interested to prosecute the cases.
Accordingly, the criminal petitions are disn.rissed for nonprosecution. Misccllaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal lretil"ion, shall stand closed.
Sd/-B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUECOPYi/
I
SECTION OFFICER
To 1. The lV MetropolitanMagistrate, Hyderabad, Nampally, Hyderabad' i o;;'iCi;siio.ruarsim-uru' Advocate(OPUC). :. il; 66.i"tn" Frulic Pioiecutor,High Court for the State of Telansana'
Hyderabad(OUT)
Kj .%,
I
HIGH COURT
DATE.D:2010612022
.i--:=:_-
/a-' <br>c^
m
COMMON ORDER
CRLP.No:;.4396, 4399 and 4400 of 2010
DISPOSING OF THE CRL.PS FOR NON.PROSECUTION.
(?X,
__./ t ,/
^V7
"(r'\
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Bharat Metal Box Co. Ltd.
C. Prakash Agarwal
Vinay Kumar Agarwal
The State of Andhra Pradesh
M/s. G.K. Stripes Pvt. Ltd.
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
