A criminal petition filed to quash proceedings was dismissed as infructuous on the submission that the matter had already been disposed of by the lower court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ,AT HYDERABAD
IUONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
Between:
CRIMINAL PETI TION NO: 7 877 0F 2013
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under section -4820f cr.p.cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar'peiition, the uigh court m;y oe pleased to quash criminar proceedings against petitioners/accused 1 & 2 in cc 302 of 2013 on the fire of the ilr-tvetiopotitan- Magistrate ctrrt, cvI"iuoro L.B.Nagar, RR District.
l.A. NO: 1 0F 2013(CRLPMP. NO:72 99 0F 2013)
Petition under section _492 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lMemorandum of Grounds of criminar'petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of afl further proceedings incruding ttre p.rsonai ,ii""dr"""'Jt tl" petitioners/accused 1 & 2 in cc 302 ":t zotz on ih" firu or ftre rlr oi l,reiiJpliitrn Magistrate court, L.B.Nagar RR Dist. tiil pendinj oisposat of the above crr.p.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon fiLuling ihe arguments of Sri B N R SHESHU, Advocate for the petitioners and *re ptiorL pros"ecutor 1rC1 on oerrarr or the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I IoN'' B I, T], SRI J USTICFI A.SAN'I]H OS I{ REI) DY
CRIMINAL Pll,'I'ITION No.787l of 20I3
oRl)!.R:
'fhis criminal petition is filed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused in C.C. No.302 of 2013 on the file of III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Cyberabad at I_.B.Nagar.
Lcarncd counsel for the petitioncrs submits tl-rat the rratter has bee, disposecl of in the lower courl and thc subjcct rnatter has bccomc infi'uctuous.
While recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Crirninal Petition is disn.rissed as inlructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal
petition, shall stand closed.
Sd/.P.PADIVANABHAREDDY ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
i/TRUE COPY//
SECWorr,"=*
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:2010612022.
ORDER
CRLP.No.7877of 2013
2s AilE 2[22
THE CRL.P. DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.
H-n
{
1-
J.Srinivasa Chary
Sriramapalaiah J.Srinivasa Chary
State represented by SHO, Uppal police
L.Ch Kopal Reddy
Sri Justice A.Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
