Dismissed

A.Shiva Kumar v. The State Inspector of Police

Telangana HC4 Jan 2022CRLP/842/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana heard a Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings. It observed that the investigation was completed and a charge sheet was filed, rendering the subject matter infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous but granted liberty to challenge the proceedings in the regular calendar case.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to challenge proceedings in the calendar case.

A.Shiva Kumar Vs The State Inspector of Police — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 842 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

A.Shiva Kumar, S/o tvlallaiah, Aged about 33^years, Occ.^{P.A. Job, Fl/o H.No.} 10-2-718, Shanti Nagar Road, AC Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad

¶8

...PETITIONEFYACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

The State lnspector of Police, SHO Bachupally P.S.,^{Rep. by its Public} Prosecutor, High Court of Telagnana, Hyderabad.

¶11

Gitan.jali, D/o Devi Chad Pawar, aged 28^yrs, Occ. Bank employee,^{Fl/o FlatNo} F5, Block A, Second Floor, Pearls Aalya Apts, Nizampet, Hyderabad 500090

¶12

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^praying thatⁱⁿ the circumstances^stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^{may be pleased} to quash all the^proceedings the crime No.704 of^{2020the SHO BachupallyPolice} Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

l.A. NO: 2 F2 2',l,

¶15

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay all the further^proceedings including arrest of the^{petitioner in} Crime^{No. 704} of 2020 on the file of the SHO, Bachupally Police Station, Cyberabad,^{Ranga reddy} District, pending disposal of the Crl.P.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the [vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V.^R. lVachavaram, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No."l .

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

¶19

THE HI )N'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN}

¶20

CRI]IINAL^{PETITION No. 842 of 2O2l}

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

Learned P rblic^{Prosecutorfiled a letter addressed by the} Sub Inspector^{Iolice, BachupallyPotice Station, showing that} they have comp.eted^{investigationin the present Cr'No 7O4 of} 2O2O on the^f le^{of BachupallyPolice Station, Cyberabad} Commissionera.e, and^{filed charge sheet and the same was} taken on file^{ride C.C.No.2662of 2O2l' The said letteris} made^{part of th : record'}

¶23

In view ol the^{same, the subjectmatterin the Criminal} Petition has^{be,,ome infructuous'}

¶24

Learned counsel^{for the petitionerseeks libertyto} challenge the^{p:oceedingsin the very CalenderCase'}

¶25

Granting liberty^{as sought,the Criminal Petition is} dismissed as nfructuous.^{Miscellaneouspetitions' if any'} pending in thi: criminal^petition ,^{shal1 stand closed.} SDTN . CHANDR,A^{SEKHAR RAO} --,^.. ASSISUNT^REGISTRAR //rRUE coPY// secrr*#rcen

¶26

'"imiitt:,"**{l:yi;l["ifiE:trn{;iiit#'EJ,iii#";::L:l:::;,*,.,. IOUTI 5 two CD^CoPies 6 One^SPareCoPY s^br

¶27

HIGH COURT

¶28

DATED: 0410112022

¶29

1dL l' Ta IA
,.( (
$ 1 F;a ?CI22

¶30

ORDER

¶31

CRL.P.No.842 cf 2021

¶32

DISMISSING TF E CRL.P AS INFRUCTUC US

¶33

/)
.U,
1)
NTM
tl )o

A.Shiva Kumar v. The State Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Shiva Kumar v. The State Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thatikonda Satish Kumar, And 4 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And Another

Nikhilesh Vs The State of Telangana

Bandari Anil Vs The State of Telangana

P.Yadagiri Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Goli Ajay and Another Vs The State of Telangana and Another

K. Mallesh Vs The State of Telangana and Another