Dismissed

K. Mallesh v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC4 Jan 2022CRLP/321/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIR No.1581 of 2020 and stay proceedings. The High Court noted that the investigation was completed and a charge sheet filed, rendering the petition infructuous. Liberty to challenge in the Calendar Case was granted.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to challenge in the Calendar Case against the charge sheet.

K. Mallesh Vs The State of Telangana and Another — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA}

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^TWO

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^K,LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 321 o 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

K. Mallesh, S/o Late K. Yadaiah,^{Aged42 yrs., Occ. Business, FUoH.No.18-2-212l'1,} Jangamet Market, Faluknama,^{Chariminar, Hyderabad - 500053}

¶8

,..PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

1 The State of Telangana and Another,^{Rep. by Public Prosecutor,High Courtfor} the State ofTelangana, at^{HyderabadThrough SHO Rajendranagar, Cyberabad.}

¶11

2 Tirupati Ravinder Reddy, S/o Yadagiri^{Reddy,Aged about 48 years, Occ} Business, Fyo 5-4-16/1 , Bhavani^{Colony, Rajendranagar, Cyberabad, Telangana} ,,.RESPONDENT/DEFACTO^COMPLAINANT

¶12

Petition under section 482 of^{Cr.P.C praying thatin the circumstancesstated} in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminal^{Petition, the High courtmay be pleased} to call for the records^{relating to F.1.R.No.1581of 2020 on the file of P.S.} Rajendranagar, Cyberabad and^{quash the same.}

¶13

l.A. NO: 1OF 2021

¶14

Petition under Section 482^{ot cr.P .c praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of criminalPetition,the High court may be pleased to} stay all further^{proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in F.1.R.No.1581ol 2O2O} on the file of P.S. Rajendranagar,^{cyberabad,pendingdisposal of the present quash} petition.

¶15

This Petition coming on for^{hearing,uponperusing the Memorandum} of Grounds of criminal^{Petition and uponhearing the argumentsof} Sri D SUDHARSHAN,Advocate^{for the Petitioner and the PublicProsecutor on behalf} of the Respondent No.^{1 and of sri K. RaghuveerReddy, Advocatefor the} Respondent No.^2.

¶16

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶17

// ,/

¶18

¶19

THE 5ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHM.AN

¶20

CRTMINAL PETITION No.32L OF 2O2l

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

Learned Public Prosecutor filed a letter addressed bv the Sub Inspect:r Police, Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad^{( :ommissionerate,} shou'ing that they have completed inrestigation in the present Cr.No.15B1 of 2027 and filed cha: ge sheet and the same was taken on file vide C.C.No.2956 ',f 2027. The said letter is made as part of the record.

¶23

In view^, rf the same, the subject matter in the Criminal Petition has b, come infructuous.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to chalienge the lroceedings in the very Calendar Case.

¶25

GrantinE liberty AS sought, the Crimina-1 Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thi ; crimina1 petition, shall stand closed.

¶26

SD/.T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTR R

//TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The XIV Addtiiona^{Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Rajendranagar'} 2. The Station House^{Officer, Rajendranagar'Cyberabad'} 3. One CC to SRl. E SUDHARSHAN^Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI K^{Raghuveer Reddy,Advocate} [OPUC] 5. Two CCs 1e 16g^{prlBLiCPROSECUTOR, High Courtfor the State of Telangana} at Hyderabad. [Ol^T]

¶32

Two CD Copies

¶33

One Spare^CoPY

TL TR tr\'

HIGH COURT

DATED:0410112122

ORDER

CRLP.No.321 cf²⁰²¹

,T
cf
t I Jl,I 2022 l
!tl)t
<br>g

¶40

DISMISSING TIIE CRIMINAL^PETITION AS INFRUCTU()US.

K. Mallesh v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Mallesh v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thatikonda Satish Kumar, And 4 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And Another

Nikhilesh Vs The State of Telangana

Bandari Anil Vs The State of Telangana

P.Yadagiri Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Goli Ajay and Another Vs The State of Telangana and Another

A.Shiva Kumar Vs The State Inspector of Police