Dismissed

Smt. G. Kausalya , Laxmi v. G. Anji Reddy, and Another

Telangana HC22 Jun 2022CRLP/7141/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw her Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Permission was granted to withdraw the criminal petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

Smt. G. Kausalya , Laxmi Vs G. Anji Reddy, and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAYOF JUNE} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7141 OF 2013

¶6

Between:

¶7

Smt. G. Kausalya @^{Laxmi, W/o.Anji Reddy,Occ: Household, R/o. Gollapally} Village, Presently R/o. at Saidapur Village, Kondapur lt4andal, Medak District.

¶8

...Petitioner/Accused

¶9

AND

¶10

1 G. An.ii Reddy, S/o. Late lvlanikya Reddy, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Gollapally Village, Kondapur Mandal, Medak District.

¶11

2 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Hyderabad.

¶12

...Respondents/Com plainant

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the orders daled. 2O-2-2O1 3 in Crl.RP.No.33 of 201 1 passed by the Special Judge for Trial of Offences under SC/ ST (POA) Act, 1989-cum- V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medak, at Sangareddy, as also the orders dated .26 -O9-2O1 1 in MC.No.9 of 2009 on the file of The Judicial First Class Magistrate-cum- Special Mobile Court, Sanga Reddy, in the interest of^justice.

¶14

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLPMP. NO: 6536 OF 2013)

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay maintenance to the petitioner for Rs. 5000/- per month pending disposal of the Crl.P.,

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B. Nalin

¶17

I i I

¶18

I I

¶19

Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of the Respondent No.'l not appearing in person or by Advocate.

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7141 OF 2013

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Learned counscl for the petitioner submits that the matter is settled out of thc Court and he seeks permission of this Court to u,ithdraw thc criminal petition.

¶25

Permission is accordcd. Accordingly, the Criminal

¶26

Petitiorr is dismissed as r.r,ithdrawn. Miscellaneous

¶27

petitions pcnding, if any, shall sLand closcd.

¶28

//TRUE coPY// "3"".1'Fi'$gAYAXilVSECTION OFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

The Special Judge for Triat of Offences under SC/ ST (pOA) Act, 198g_ cum- V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medak, at Sangareddy.

¶31

The Judicial First Class Magistrate-cum- Special Mobile Court, Sanga Reddy.

¶32

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶33

One CC to Sri B. Natin Kumar, Advocate [OpUC]

¶34

Two CD Copies

¶35

One Spare Copy

[{N4K

t\w

HIGH COURT

DATED:2210612022

ORDER

CRLP.No.7141 of 2013

eLd.
a) )*
.s
IJ
Cr
F (t-.]\ r.f
C.o 't)

¶44

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDFIAWN

¶45

Smt. G. Kausalya , Laxmi v. G. Anji Reddy, and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. G. Kausalya , Laxmi v. G. Anji Reddy, and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiva Kumar Vs a.Pradeep Kumar

M/S J.R. Exim India, Hyd and Anr. Vs State, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Abdul Muqeed, Hyderabad., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and 2 Otrs.

Panja V.S.K. Harsa Murthy Vs Smt. P. Lakshmi and 2 Others

Vayugundla Ramesh Vs the State of Ap., Rep Byits P.P and Anothrs

Kakarla Geetha Rani Vs State of Telangana and Another