Dismissed

Vayugundla Ramesh v. the State of Ap., Rep Byits P.P and Anothrs

Telangana HC23 Jun 2022CRLP/15603/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge High Court order dismissing a Criminal Misc. Petition (Section 482 Cr.P.C) praying to quash proceedings due to lack of Interest of petitioner by the court for non-prosecution, leaving no substantive legal proposition.

What did the court decide?

No relief; Criminal petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

Vayugundla Ramesh Vs the State of Ap., Rep Byits… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE^{TWENTYTHIRD DAY OF JUNE} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSHREDDY}

¶5

CRIMI AL^PE ITION NO:^'15603 oF2¹³

¶6

Between:

¶7

VAYUGUNDLA^{RAIMESH'io= tt-1llagestrwalg} [a9'^{aged34 years.Occ:} lrilanaoinq Director,^{Citytnio jo'iution.,n7oFlat No.404,5thFloor,Surabi Shopier} ffi;;i;i;Xt;^{-G;i.b"oix-n,ijoi,l-ivderabad N/o. H No 6-155' MainBazar'} X;xJi"'olJt7iJ iw'ongtv^{mention in FIR Ramesh} iif;l,'i correct "".,i'VirrJe[;;i,i,q: name^CT.)

¶8

...PETITIONER/S

¶9

AND

¶10

The State^{Of Telangana, Rep' by its PublicProsecutor'High Court of} Telangana,^HYderabad'

¶11

2 N venkata^{r1,,.11,,:1iJ#*1fl31/il} -ils;gi3,li3i,?: 3::,fi:?:'3:T Nataratna^{Dancelnstltute' #o-4-+rr/I' r\evYeiiv -'-r-}

¶12

...RES'ONDENT/S

¶13

lil*ld']fi^{["i"#'J.["1:ff'"r+,,*1"*fl *:i$r"#v[#'s:rii}

¶14

t.A. N 1 OF 01 RLP P NO J 71 F 013

¶15

t.A. N 1 the^{circumstances} ing thatⁱⁿ Petition^unde r randum Section^{of 4G} 82 rounds^{of Cr'P} of^C Crimina^PraY I 012012 Petition,t^ol he^{P.S. HigC} h^entral Court^Crimemay statedbe Pleain the sed^{to Memoquash} the in viewP roceedof the ings^comtn promise F.l.R.No^ent14 ered^betw een^th e Petitioners Station, Hyderabad, and^{theresPondents1to4}

¶16

l.A N o t/ OF²⁰ J C RL M P .N 13^720F2 13

¶17

l.A N o t/ OF²⁰ that^{in the circumstances} Petition^under andumSection of^{482 Grounds o{ Cr'o} P.C f Criminal PraYing^P etition, againsl^theth HlsePe^{h Court} titioner^mayin statedbep leasedin the^Memor to^stay of S.^Cenall tral further^Crime Pr^S oceedingstation, Hvd erabad,^Pen ding^disPosalof t2O12^{ot P} No.1⁴⁰ F.I,R the^{main criminalpetition}

¶18

¶19

I.A. N :30F201 CRLPMP. N O: 13973 OF²⁰¹³⁾

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C prayingthat in thecircumstances} stated in the Memorandum of^{Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Courtmay} be pleased to^permit the^{petitioner to file the compromise petition}

¶21

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon^{perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition^{and upon hearingthe arguments of Sri S.VIPLAVA} SIMHA REDDY ,Advocate for the^{Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG/AP)} on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Syed^{FarathAhmed, Advocate for} the Respondent No.2

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

HON'BLE SR' JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY

¶24

(r1.p.No.15603 of 2013

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

No representation lor the Pelitioner and the second lespondent rnsprle ol Iisting the nlattcr undet. thc caption "1br d ism issai,,.

¶27

'fhe Criminal petition is llled to quash the proceedings in Cr.No. 140 of 2012 of Cenrral Crime Station, Flyderabad. It appears that the petitioner is not interested te prq5ssute the nrattct..

¶28

Hence, this Crirainal petition is dismissed for non-prosec ution. As a sequel, thc miscellaneous petitions, if any, pcnding in th e Criminal petition shall stand clo sed

¶29

¶30

SD/- T,JAYASREE AASTSTANT REGTSTRAR //TRUE COpy// To, SECyIOI\rOFF|CER 1 The Xll Addl. Chief Metropolitan l\Iagistrate at Hyderabad.

¶31

The Ho_use Officer, Cential Crime Siation, HvO6raUaO.

¶32

3, One CC to SRl. S VIPLAVA. SlMtiA nEOOV,'AJvoiate IOPUC] 4. One CC to SYED FARATH AHI/ED, Advocaie tOpUCi '-^{- -'}

¶33

Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High Couri for the State OfTelangan, Hyderabad (OUT) 6. Two CD Coples 7. One Spare CopyOne Spare Copy

¶34

One Spare CopyOne Spare Copy Anv <sup>.V

HIGH^COURT

DATED:2311612022

ORDER

L T
'o'
v\l
oll
o IE ruB ?[12 3/
4//
<br>1,/
:'/t
t) c S ?pi

¶39

CRLP.No.15603^{of 2013}

¶40

DISMISSING THE CRL.P

Vayugundla Ramesh v. the State of Ap., Rep Byits P.P and Anothrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vayugundla Ramesh v. the State of Ap., Rep Byits P.P and Anothrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panja V.S.K. Harsa Murthy Vs Smt. P. Lakshmi and 2 Others

Smt. G. Kausalya , Laxmi Vs G. Anji Reddy, and Another

Shiva Kumar Vs a.Pradeep Kumar

Kakarla Geetha Rani Vs State of Telangana and Another

Smt.K.Vasudha, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mrs.P.Vijitha, Hyderabad and Anr., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.