High Court of Telangana disposed of Criminal Petition No. 10638 of 2014 filed to quash proceedings. The Court held the matter was settled and the petition had become infructuous.
The petition was allowed; miscellaneous petitions during pendency stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
I I
I I ? I 1 i iI
liubsii.,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10638 OF 2014
Between:
GANDHAM BHAGATH, s/o Gandham Krihna, Aged about 33 years, Occ:Busniess, Rl/o'Plot No.l9, c/o Hanuman Kirana Stores, I Floor, Green Hills Colony, Street No.B, Habsiguda, Hyderabad.
.,.PETITION ERYACCUSED
ANDlr',. :'i l
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the- Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the orders passed in Crl.R.P. 23 of 2O14 on the file of the Court of the V Addl. District and Session's Judge (FAST TRACK COURT) at Lb Nagar, Ranga Reddy District and allowthe petition.
l.A. NO: 1 OF.2014(CRLPMP. NO:'10611 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in CC.No.162 of 2012 on the file of the learned lst Special Magistrate Court at Hasthinapur, R.R.District.
I I 1 I
I I
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Groilirds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri , M. Aitarnath, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of ' .. !)::i' the'Responde nt No. 2 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 1.
The Cou rt made the following: ORDER
.:-
/
IION'I}I,E SItI.IIiS I'I( [, .. S,\N'I'IIoSII I{I.,I)DY
clRIN,llNAl. Pl.l I I't'lo\ \o. t06.lll of 20ll
ORDI]II:
'lhis case is Illed to cluaslr thc olders passcd in (lrl.R.P. No. 23 of 2014 on thc fllc of'V Adclitionel I)istrict ancl Scssions Judgc ( Fast Track Court) at l..ll. Naear, Ranga Ile'ddr I)istrict and allow the petition
Lcarned counscl fbr thc pttitioncr-subnrits tlral thc rnatter has been settlcd out ol' coLlrl. IIcnec. thc l)llttcr has becomc infructuous.
Whilc recording thc strtrnrissiorr ol' lctrrnccl cor:nscl lor the
petitioner, the Crinrinal [)ctition i: tlirnrirs.'rl rs inltuctuous.
Misccllancor-rspctitions. il' rtttr. PCrrdir)gin tl'ris criminal
petition, shall stand c loscd.
I
SD/-K.SAILESHI I DEPUTYREGISTRAR I lg).,-
//TRUECOPY// lg).,SECTIONOFFICER
I
To, .-
st TractCourt)at L'B'Nagar'
r theStateol Te\angana'
lourl
-:. rr fiI*{i li}' { 4l [F, IG COURT Ii. I :at I DATED: 2010712022
t""
$'i $i?
.No.10638 of 2014 *!: rl i: :l t
SING T MINAL PETITION
FRUCT UOUS.
4
)
\y
GANDHAM BHAGATH
The State of Telangana
A.Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
