High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioners who were listed for dismissal in a case involving suspension of execution of an order.
Criminal Revision Case No. 131 of 2019 dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 131 OF 2019
Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 Cd.P.C against the Judgment in Crl.A.No.382 of 2018 dated 16111118 on the file of the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of JHCBBC-cum- lX Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabadpreferred against the Order in DVC No.29 of 2016 dated 2710312018 on the file of the Court of the lV Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad.
Between:
AND
........Respondent
lA NO: 1 OF 201 9
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum ofgrounds of CriminalRevision Case, theHigh Court may bepleased to suspend the execulion of orderpassed in Crl.Appeal.No. 382 of 2018 passed by the Hon'ble Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, forthe trial
of JHBBC -cum -Family Court Judge at Nampa y, Hyderabad, Dt.16.11.2018 till the disposal of the main Revision Petition_
This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusjng the Memorandum of grounds of Criminal Revision Case Sri M.A.eavi Abbasi, Advocate for the petitioner not present and of the public prosecutor (TG/AP) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Mohd. Vaqar Hussain, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
l
I
I
IIONOt,iRAt .L SRI.t trS't't( l_ ..S..\N.f I IOSI I RUDDy
CItI],IINAI, RI,\TISIO \ CASI.] \ o. I-l| of 2019
oRr)ER:
'fhis crirrrinal r.cr,,ision case is lilcd againsr thc Judgmoent and ordcr passcd in (irl. Appcal No. lgl o1- 20lE passed by thc Addl. Mctropolitan Sessions .ludge lbr rhe trial ol JI{BBC cum Fam ily Court Judgc ar Narnpally, I l_yderabad, tlated I 6. l l .20l g.
f'hcre is no represenlation fbr the petitioners in spite of listing the matter undcr rhe caption .,1or disrnissal,,. I lcnce, it appears that the petitioners are not intercstcd to plosecute the matter
In view of the same, this crintinal rcvision case is dismissed lor non prosccur ion.
Miscellaneous pctitions pcnding, i1. any, in this Criminal
Revision Case shall stand closed.
Sd/-/K.SRINIVASARAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
2 The lV MetropoliianMagistrate, at Hyderabad - .. ^. . 3 i*i'cc"1ii t["prblic irosecutor, liigh courtforthe state of Telangana' Hvderabad(OUT) 4 oire CC to SrlM.A.Qavi Abbasi, Advocate (OPUq) - One CC toSri Mohd. Vaqar Hussain. Advocate (oPUL;)
Kj.
k\i>
HIGH COURT
DATED:1910712022
Kffi;,
t!*,<
lo 2 0 AtlB ?[??
.J
\YI.
OROER
CRLRC.No.131 of 2019
OISMISSNG THE CRL.R.C. FOR NON.PROSECUTION sv.> \D *Nk
Mir Aijaz Ali
Mir Imtiyaz Ali
Mir Ehtesham Ali
Mir Barkat Ali
The State of Telangana
Wahidunnisa Begum
Justice A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
