The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment and stay of criminal proceedings as infructuous without costs.
The criminal petitions were dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
CRIMINAL PET|T|ON NO:.t0614 OF 201S
Between:
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 2 & 3
AND
...RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
...RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under section 482 of cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to QUASH proceedings in c.c.No.378 oF 2013 on the fire of Xlrl Addl. chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad pending against the petitioners.
CRLPMP. NO: 10618 oF 2015
Petition under section 482 of cr.p"c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings in c.c.No.37g oF 2013 on the file of xlll Addl. chief Metroporitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, pending against the Petitioners/Accused No.2 & 3, including dispensing their personal attendance before the Court, pending disposal of the above criminal petition.
I
--his Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grouncs of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M V RAJ KUMAR GABRIEL ,Advocate for the Petitioners and the public prosecutor (TG/AP) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri A.K. Kishore Reddy Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 (Being absent).
The Court made the following: ORDER
I ION' BLT] SIt I J TJS1'I(-.T] A.SA NTI I OS I I R I., DD Y
CRI M INAI, PI''TI1'IO NNo .106 I I ol'2 0r-s
ORDEIT:
I-earned counsel lor thc petitioncrs subrnits that the mattcr
has beconre infructuous.
While recording thc subrnission of. lcarncd counsel for the
petitioners, the Criminal pctition is disrnisscd as inttucruous.
Misccllaneous pctitions. il. an-v. pcnding in th is criminal
pctrtion. shall srand c loscd.
SD/-T.JAYASREE
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
To,
SECTION OFFICER
NPJ
HIGTI COURT
DATED:1910712022
ORD,ER
CRLP.No.10614 of 2015
',-.
(
0 5 IEP 7"[?? (l
t
DIS|IJIISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
AS INFRACTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
'L)'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition seeking quashment/stay of proceedings under Section 482 CrPC had become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Laxmi & Another
State of Telangana
Smt. K. Nagara Rani
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
