A PIL invoking Article 226 for violation of UGC guidelines regarding Ph.D. scholar allocations was dismissed as the petitioner withdrew the petition without pressing the matter.
None, as the petition was disposed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
Between:
WP(PIL) NO: 12 OF 2020
AND
Kudumula S-rinirlqs, S/o. Rajaiah, Aged about 39 years, Occ. phd. Aspirant, Resident of H-No.1-18, BC ColSny, Ellanthakunta' frrtandat, Dacharam, Karimnagar District ,..PETITIONER
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of I,4andamus to declare the action of third respondent in allocating more than the maximum number of Ph.D. Research Scholars to the professors, Associate Professors, Assistant Professors and co-supervisors vide Admission Notification daled 0211112017 in violation of guidelines issued by first and second respondent vide notification dated 05/05/20'16 as arbitrary, illegal and without any authority of law and Article'14 of constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct respondents to correct the irregularities committed in Notification dated 02111/2017 including notifications dated 1110312019, 1410312019, 2910612019 in various departments of third respondent and further direct third respondent to issue a fresh notifrcation forthwith for filling up vacancies of Ph.D. Research Scholars in compliance with the guidelines laid down by first and second respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VASAM ANAND KUMAR
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI N. RAJESHWAR RAO
ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
Counsel for Respondent No. 2: M/s. MEGHA RANI AGARWAL
Counsel for Respondent No. 3: SRI CH. JAGANNATHA RAO
Counsel for Respondent No.4: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THEH BLE TIIECHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION GIL).No.12of 2020
ORDER:(Per the Hon'blethe Chief Justice HimaKohlil
to withdraw the Present Petition.
petition is disposed ofas not pressed along with the pending
app lications, if any.
UM AR S D/.T.KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Qe> //TRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
I
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 081021202'l
'{ He 0 T4 r4r
(
o 1 I tEB 2021
*
6
ORDER
WP(PIL).N o.12 of 2020
DrsPoslNG oF THE WP(PIL) AS NOT PRESSED
WITHOUT COSTS
cN BtlP:ul ' Itrrr \or-f>{
W.P. No. 12 of 2020 (Nepal/Practical Aspirant)
Union of India
University Grants Commission
Osmania University
State of Telangana
Hima Kohli
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
