Writ appeals were disposed of as not pressed when the appellants' counsel requested and was granted leave to pursue a criminal complaint against the respondents instead.
Leave granted to pursue criminal complaint; appeals disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT APPEAL Nos.141 and 143 of 2019
WRIT APPEAL NO: 141 OF 2019
Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent appeal filed against the order dated 26-09-2018 passed in Writ Petition No.20046 ol 201$on the file of the High Court.
Between:
AND
...RespondenURespondent No.1
...Respondents/Petitioners
lA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Order dated 26.09.2018 passed in W.P.No,20046 of 2018.
IA NO: 3 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to file additional affidavit along with material documents i.e., 1). Copy of lncome Tax Audit Report for the assessment year 2017-2018:2). Copy of lncome Tax Audit Report for the assessment year 2018-2019; and 3). Copy of Acknowledgement of Registration of Firm dated 16.09.2017 issued by the Government of Telangana.
il2il
WRIT APPEAL NO: 143 OF 2019
Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal Preferred Against Order Dated 26-09-2018 Passed in W.P.No.20297 of 2019. on the file of the High Court. Between:
...Writ Appellants/Respondents No.2 & 3
AND
...RespondenURespondent No.1
lA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Order dated 26.09.2018 passed in W.P.No.20297 of 2018.
lA NO: 3 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to file additional affidavit along with material documents i.e., 1). Copy of lncome Tax Audit Report for the assessment year 2017-2018:2). Copy of lncome Tax Audit Report for the assessment year 2018-2019; and 3). Copy of Acknowledgement of Registration of Firm dated'16.09.2017 issued by the Government of Telangana.
Counsel for the Appellants in both W.As.: SRl. SWAROOP OORILLA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 in both W.As.: SRI B. MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR HPCL
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 in both W.As.: SRI M. GOVIND REDDY
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THEHON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
TIIE HON'BLE SRt JUSTICE B. VIJAYSENREDDY
WRIT APPEAL Nos.141and 143of 2019
COMMO NJUDGMENT.(Perthe Hon'blethe ChiefJusticeHima Kohli)
l. Learned counselfor the appellants states that instead of pressing thepresent appeals,his clients shallbe givenleaveto pursue the criminalcomplaint,registeredas FIR'No'48 of2019' P.S.Kamareddy,filed against the respondents No'3 to S/writ petitioners, in accordancewithlaw'
ending apPlications,il anY' disposed ofas not pressed along with the p
SD/-K,SRINIVASARAO JOINTREGISTRAR
To,
//TRUEGOPY//
secrro(\Jrrrcen
tsrtb%'n'
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810212021
COMMON JUDGEMT
W.A.Nos.141 and 143 of 2019
1 H E 14
3 24 FEB 2021 7_
*
DISPOSING OF THE WRITAPPEALS AS NOT PRESSED WITHOUT COSTS
\L{
)-<br>>3
Smt. Cheela Vijaya
Sri. Cheela Balaji
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
It//s. Balaji Service Station
Sri. Cheela Bhaskar
Sri. Cheela Narender
Hima Kohli
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
