Allowed

Nallagonda Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Feb 2021WP/7828/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal and writ petition under the letters patent and Article 226 of the Constitution regarding a civil supply tender. Both parties sought to render the proceedings infructuous due to unresolved status or withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the appeal and writ petition; the matter disposed of as infructuous with pending applications also disposed accordingly.

Nallagonda Ramesh Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

IMONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶5

WRIT APPEAL NO: 82 OF 2019 AND WRIT PETITION NO: 7828 OF 2019

¶6

WRIT APPEAL NO: 82 OF 2019:

¶7

Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, Preferred against the Order Daled24-01-2019 in W.P.No.33872of 2018 on thefile of the High Court.

¶8

Between:

¶9

K.Venkataramana, S/o. Yadagiri, Age,39 years, Occ: Transport Contractor, R/o. House No,4-1-42, Sher Bungalow, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District - 508001.

¶10

...Appe lla nUWrit Petitioner

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, 6-3-655/1/A, 3rd Floor, Civil Supplies Bhavan, Punjagutta Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad - 500082.

¶14

Nallagonda Ramesh, S/o. Punnaiah, Age,40 Years, Occ: Business, Rl/o. House No.4-89/4/3, Bhavani Nagar, Gudibanda Road, Kodada Town and Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶15

...Respondents/Respondents

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including award of contract to the 3'd Respondent in pursuance of Tender Reference No.PDS2/Movt./FG 5(1)/Stage I Tenders/2O1 8-1 9/TS dt. 25.08.201 B for the year 2018-19 for Suryapet District, Telangana, by suspending the impugned order d1.24.1.20'19 in W.P.No.33872/2018 pending disposal of the above writ a ppeal.

¶18

Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. L ARANYA SAURABH

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A. JAGAN, SC FOR TSCSCL

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI V. RAGHU

¶22

ltzll

¶23

WRIT PETITION NO: 7828 oF 2019:

¶24

Between:

¶25

Nallagonda Ramesh, S/o. Punnaiah, Aged about 41 Years, Occ: Business, H.No.4-8914/3, Bhavani Nagar, Gudibanda Road, Kodad, Kodad Town and Mandal, Suryapet District.

¶26

...PETITIONER

¶27

AND

¶28

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supply Department, Secretariat building, Hyderabad.

¶29

The Telangana State Civil Supply Corporation Limited, Rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, 6-3-655/1/A, 3rd Floor, Civil Supply Bhavan, pan.jagutta Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

¶30

K. Venkataramana, S/o. Yadagiri, Aged about 40 Years, Occ: Transport

¶31

Contractor, R/o. H.No.4-1 -42, ShareBanglow, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District

¶32

..,RESPONDENTS

¶33

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No. PDS2i Movt/ FG5 ( 1) / Stage - I Tenders I 2018-1sl rs/ Suryapet of the 2nd respondent dated 05.04.2019 is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violation of the principles of aural justice and as well as the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of lndia set aside the same consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as stage - I contractor of Suryapet District.

¶34

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶35

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent to continue the petitioner as stage - I contractor of Suryapet by suspending the proceedings No.PDS2 /[/ovt/ FG5 (1) / Stage - I Tenders t 2O1B_ 2019/ TS/ suryapet of the 2nd respondent dated 05.04.2019forthwith pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

¶36

lA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶37

Between:

¶38

K. Venkataramana, S/o. Yadagiri, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Transport Contractor, Fi./o. H.No.4-1-42, Share Banglow, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.

¶39

AND

¶40

.. Petitioner/Res pondent No.3

¶41

1 Nallagonda Ramesh, S/o. Punnaiah, Aged about 41 years, Occ: Business,.H.N^o.4-891413, Bhavani Nagar, Gudibianda Road, XoOaa, XoOa'a fown and lt'4andal' suryapet District ..petitioner

¶42

2 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Civil Supply Department, Secretariat buitding] Hyilerabad.

¶43

il3ll

¶44

The Telangana State Civil Supply Corporation Limited, Rep by its Vice Chairman and l,4anaging Director, 6-3-655/1/A, 3rd Floor, Civil Supply Bh avan, Panlagutta Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

¶45

...Respondents

¶46

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to vacate the interim order daled 1510412019 in l.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.7828 of 2019^pending disposal of the above writ^petition.

¶47

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. VENUMADHAV

¶48

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

¶49

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A. JAMGAN, SC FOR^TSCSCL

¶50

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI l. ARANYA^SAURABH

¶51

The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT

¶52

THE H N'BLE THE CHIEF STI E HIMA KO^HLI AND

¶53

THE HON 'BLE^{SRI JUSTICEB. VIJAYSEN REDDY}

¶54

WRIT APP EAL^{No.82of 2019} AND WRIT PE^{TITIONNo.7828 0F 2019}

¶55

COMM ON JUD^{GMENT:(Per the t{on'blcthe Chief Justice Hima Kohli)}

¶56

l. Leamed counsel^{for the appellant and leamed counsel for the} petitioner state that^{the present appeal and the petitionhave been}

¶57

rendered infructuous^{and therefore,seekleaveto withdraw the same'}

¶58

Leave, as^{prayedfor, is granted' The present appeal and the}

¶59

petition are disposed^{of as infructuousalong with the pending}

applications,^ifanY.

To,

//TRUE COPY//

SD/. CH.VENKATESWARULU DEPUTY REGISTRAR /\ ,\ | _.SECTION OFFICER

¶65

¶66

1 One CC to Sri l. Aranya Saurabh, Advocate IOPUCI 2 Two CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to Sri A. Jagan, SC FOR TSCSCL IOPUCI 4 One CC to Sri V. Raqhu, Advocate IOPUCI 5 One CC to Sri K. Venumadhav, Advbcate tbpucl 6 Two CD Copies CHR

}NK

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810212021

COMMON JUDGMENT

'fnE STA
k
:=l
2 5 rtB 2021
_t
.:..l ,: ):

¶72

WRIT APPEAL NO: 82 OF 2019

¶73

AND

¶74

WRIT PETITION NO: 7828 OF 2019

¶75

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AND WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶76

.r-. 2fiL

Nallagonda Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nallagonda Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.P. Rama Krishna Reddy Vs The Xix Junior Civil Judge Court

Masa Krishnaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Nukala Sugunamma Vs The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Kudumula Srinivas Vs The Union of India And 3 Others

K.Venkataramana Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Cheela Vijaya, Vs The Chief Regional Manager