The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 2189 of 2021, challenging the uploading of a judgment online before pronouncement, as not pressed, directing the petitioner to submit a representation instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 2189 OF2021
Between:
Nukala Suqunamma, W/o. Seetha Ram Reddy,aged 68 years, Occ.House wife, R/o. Santhoshnagar Colony, lViryalaguda Town,Nalgonda District.
...pETt,oNER
AND
...RESP.NDENr'
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High court may be pleasedto issue an order or direction moreparticularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the 3rdrespondentin uploadingthe Judgmentin c.c.No.1235 ol 2O15 on internetandmakingthe Judgment availableto the public before pronouncement is highly arbitrary,bad and illegal and Quash Judgment dated 25t1012018 kept in shield coverby the 3rd respondent and consequentlytransfer the c.c.No.1235 of 2015 on thefile of 3rd respondentto any other Magistratecourt situated in Miryalaguda, NalgondaDistrictto proceedfurther with the case
lA NO: 1 OF 1 Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High courtmay be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in c.c.No.1235of 2015 on the file of special l/agistrate court at Ir/iryalaguda i.e., 3'd respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI P. PRABHAKARREDDY
Counsel for the RespondentNo. 1: GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
Gounsel for RespondentNos. 2 & 3: SMT.V. UMA DEVI, SC FOR TSHC
Counsel for Respondent No.4: --
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE HIMA KOHLT AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN DDY
WRIT PETITION No.2189 of 2021
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chi€f Justice Hima Kohli)
l. Leamed counsel for the petitioner states that instead ofpressing the present petition, the petitioner may be permitted to address a letter directly to the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court with a grievance as raised in the present petition. He submits that such a representation shall be submitted within one week. On receiving the said representation, Registrar (Judicial) shali examine the same and take appropriate remedial steps at the earliest.
'il:rclyimthe pending applications,if any.
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// @
sEcTtoN oFF|CER
To,
IVBC
x!/,(
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0510212021
'?if: -
1 rt€ rO IA
k
oo 1 g t E B 2021 z
a
. a
F,sor,i
ORDER
WP.No.2189 ot 2021
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS
NOT PRESSED, WITHOUT COSTS
s$v. ,
*t c-oore.D
I , t\ ^
)r \4V{'-'1
Nukala Suqunamma
The State of Telangana
High Court for the State of Telangana
tviamidi Pra-bhakar
Hima Kohli
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
