Justice K. Lakshman of the Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition under Articles 226 and Section 151 CPC as infructuous, finding no further pending matter to adjudicate regarding police protection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 6019 0F 2019
Between:
!ym19la.Nargsaiah S/o. Atchaiah, Aged about 72 ve r-vo. Plot No.301, Phase-l Saket, Kapra,-secunderabaci _ars, Occ. Retd. 500062Emolovee.
...PETITIONER
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ/s more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the 2nd Respondent in providing the police protection pursuant to the order dated 31st Jan. 2019 passed in E.A. 5 of 2o1g in E.p. 4 of 2019 on the file of '1st Addl. Junior civil Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar to the schedule property as illegal, arbitrary and u n constitutio na I and consequen y direct the 2nd respondent to provide police protection to the schedule property pursuant to the order dated 31st January 2019 passed in E.A. 5 of 2019 in E.p. 4 of 2019 on the file of 1"tAddl. Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar.
lA NO:'l OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to lssue interim directions to the 2nd respondent to forthwith provide police protection to the Petitioner and the schedule property pursuant to the order dated 31s' Jan. 2019 passed in E.A. 5 of 2019 in E.P. 4 of 2019 on the file of 1"t Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagarpending disposal of the writ
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.KRISHNA SUMANTH, REPRESENTINGFOR
SRI. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 &2: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the RespondrlntNo.3: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THEIION,BLE JUSTICE K'LAKSHMAN
WRIT ON No.60190F20L9
ORDER:
Sri N.KrishnaSumanth 'learned counselre'cresenting Sri RajagopallavanTayi' learned counsel for the petitioner would submit thatthe carrse in the writ petitionno ronger survivesfor adjudicationand has become infructuous'
Recordingthe said submission' this Writ Petitionis
<lismissedas infructuous'No costs'
Miscellaneous Petitions'ifany, Pending ir'this writ
petition, shallstand c19!td,..
//TRUECOPY//
AsslrirANr SD/.V.SUDHAHEel"sr-RAR ,/ G, SECTIONOFFICER
'"'l ff: BBji"''iFi,fifiB?13:?i[['E[$liS:?ffif,:,t""Jr " i.f?'otto onuSPare "oo'".CoPY'
reransanaat Hvderabad
MP s.--
HIGH COURT
DATED:1510712021
c
o<br>z.:.t <br>i(
u .lt} hUStS2l j-'
*
\ r-"
:/,
i
r)F SP
ORDER WP.No.6019of 2019
DISMISSINGTHEWRITPETITIoNASINIFRUCTUoUS WITHOUTCOSTS
g
*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives adjudication or has become infructuous.
S. Nagarsaiah
State of Telangana
Station House Officer, Nacharam
M. Savitri Deivii
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
