The writ petition challenging the seizure of the petitioner's passport during a police inquiry was dismissed as infructuous after learned counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer survived for adjudication.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 334 OF 2019
Between:
E. Navin Kumar, S/o E. Ramanarsaiah, Aged 36years, Occ. Private employee, R/o. H.No.12-1-5071611, Laxminagar, Near DurgaHighSchool,Lallapet, Secunderabad
...PETrroNER
AND
RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High cou( may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus orany otherappropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of therespondents in seizing petitioner original passpotl declaring the action of therespondents in seizing petitioner originalpassportvide No.M9972066 during the course ofenguiry, while he has attendedthe 3rd respondent Police Station toattendenquiry in connectionwith the notice issuedby them under Section41(A) Cr.P.C. in Cr.No.268/20',l8registeredunder Sections 498(4), 342, 323 IPCread with Section 34 IPC of Lallaguda P'S , Hyderabadas illegal and beyond thepowersof the respondents3 and 4 and for a consequential direction to the respondents3 and 4 to return his original passport vide No.M9972066
IA NO : 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents toreturn petitioner original passport videNo.M9972066 forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition'
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI S. S. R. MURTHY
Counsel for Respondents:GP FOR HOME
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.334 of 2019
ORDER:
Leamed counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand dismissed. SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT R GISTRAR //TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HiGHCOURT
DATED:151071202'l
ORDER
WP.No.334 of 2019
1H e STA r{i
o;
I q.
Jo() O7 AUG 2021 o
.L
+
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Afn
2)
E. Navin Kumar
State of Telangana
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
