Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 425 of 2019 challenging police interference with personal liberty. Court Recorder-session on no interference and dismissed the petition as infructuous.,
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ' (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 425 OF 2019
Between:
Mr. Thota Pavan, S/o. Mr. Thota Ravinder, Aged about22, Occ.Student,Rl/o.H. No. 1-7-1356, 1-7-1356 / 1,1st Floor, Road No. 7-B, Advocates Colony,Hanamkonda, Warangal Urban District, Telangana State - 506001
..,ET'T,ONER
AND
...RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ/order/smore particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of therespondentin interferingwith petitioner personal lifeand liberty, without dueprocess of law as being illegal and violativeof articles 14 and 21 of the lndian Constitution.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section'1 51CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High court may be pleased to lssue interim directions, directihg therespondent no.2,and 3 not to summon the petitioner or his family members tothe police station,pending disposalof this writ petition.
COUNSEI fOr thE PCtitiONET:SRI N. KRISHNA SUMANTHFOR SRIVIVEK JAIN
Counsel for the RespondentNos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the ResPondentNo'4: -
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No. 425 OF 2OL9
ORDER:
Sri N. Krishna Sumanth, learned counsel r:presenting Sri Vivek Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner wc,uld submit that there is no interference by the Police with the prersonal life and liberty of the petitioner. Therefore, the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending irr this writ
petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1510712021
ORDER
WP.No.425 of 2019
1'tr E STAT c
k
20fl c
\'4
-{r. .-
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WTTHOUT COSTS
Mr. Thota Pavan
Department of Home
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
