Writ petition filed by APSRTC employees regarding cancellation of notional increment sought dismissal as infructuous without costs.
Discontinuation of writ petition with no order as to costs and pending miscellaneous petitions stayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Originat Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTE[/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO:'15358 OF 2005
Betwee n:
S.Reddy, S/o.Papi Reddy, Mechanic(E-78730)
2.N Mallesham, S/o. Narsimha, Mechanic(E-591 78) 3D N.Reddy, S/o.Pulla Reddy, Driver (E-88755) 4.D Mallaiah, S/o.Venkaiah, Driver(E-89380) 5. rv .D.Yaseen, S/o.Yacob, 53 Driver(E-83352) O, V Anjaiah, S/o.Buchaiah, Driver(E-87452)
(All are working in APSRTC, Nalgonda Bus Depot, Nalgonda.)
...PETITIONERS
AND
The Depot lvlanager, APSRTC., Nalgonda Bus Depot' Nalgonda
...RES'.NDENT
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHighCourt may be pleased to lssue a writ or order or direction moreparticularly one in the natureof writ of mandamus declaring that the action of therespondent in recovering the amountsby canceling notional increment is concernedwith petitioner'sGrade lpost is bad arbitrary illegal, unjust, unreasonable andcontrary to the circulars by setting aside the office order No.P1l544(1)l2K-NLG dated14'6-2005 of the respondenthereinand consequently direct the respondent topay all the arrearsin concerned withthe withdrawing of the notional increment at thestage of allowinggrade I Post. WPMP. NO: 19509 0F 2005
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHighCourt maybe pleased to staythe recovery of amounts from thepetitioner salaryin concerned with the withdrawingof notional incrementsgiven in thepost of Grade lbysuspendingofficeorder No.P1 /544(1 )/2K-NLG dated 1 41612005.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl.P. VENKATESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent: SMTB.G. UMADEVI
The Court made the following: ORDER
.I III,, Iio'BI-I,] SRI .JT S'[ICI,,\I]HI{\I) KI. \IAII SIIAVILI
\ RIT PE-I'ITION No.l535ti OF 200t
ortr)[R:
Counsel tbr the' petitioners has intbrmed the Court that the
sr"rb.ject nratter ol'tl-ris writ petition has becorne infi.uctlrous
Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition IS
disrnissed as infl'uctuous. No order as to costs.
Pencling ntiscellaneous petitions, i1-anv, shall stand :1,:sed.
SDr. R.KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' ei,
To, 1 One C C to Sri P. Venkateswar Rao, Advocate tOpUCl 2 One C 9 !^oSmt B.G. Uma Devi,Advocate tOpUCl J Two C D Copies 4 One S pare Copy CHR
;ECTION OFFICER
*--
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0810912021
ORDER
W.P.No.15358 of 2005
,; sl A? i'
1
e d i1
)-J 07 0912011
4,..
-r.
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
e*< /rA<sup>1i) 6
S.Reddy, 2.N Mallesham, 3.D N.Reddy, 4.D Mallaiah, 5. D.Yaseen, O. V Anjaiah
The Depot leveler, APSRTC., Nalgonda Bus Depot Nalgonda
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
