The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petitions No. 3917 and 5020 of 2016 filed by a Fair Price Shop Dealer seeking relief under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC due to default by the petitioner.
Petition dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY .THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T,AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO: 3917 OF 2016
Betwee n :
G, Srinivas, S/o. Balakrishna, F. P. Shop Dealer, Circle No. 6, 1-S-125123, Ramnagar, Hyderabad.
F.P. Shop No.641,
.,.PETITIONER
AND
'1 . The State of Telangana, rep. by its Ex-Officio Secretary , Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies (CS-1) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue any writ, order or direction particularly a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondents to continue thepetitioner as Dealer in respect of F.P. Shop No.641, Circle No. 6, 1-9-129123, Ramnagar, Hyderabad by setting aside the impugned proceedings No. 53/2016 vide No. C2123812016,dtd.27-01-2016 of the 2nd respondent by declaring it as arbitrary, illegal and violative of articles 1a, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of lndia besides violation of the relevantprovisions of A.P. Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008.
WPMP. NO: 5020 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased todirectthe respondents to continue thepetitioner as Dealer in respect of F.P. Shop No.641, Circle No. 6, 1-9-129123, Ramnagar, Hyderabad by Suspending theimpugned proceedings No. 53i 2016 vide No.C2123812016, dld.27-01-2016 of the 2nd respond e nt.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI B. M. PATRO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following: ORDER
,.:,/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT oN NO.39r 7 0F 20L6
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up, there is representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for defauit. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions
pending if any shall stand closed.
SD/-T.KRISHNAKUMAR ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
I
/iTRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, '1 . One CC to Sri B. tvl Patro, Advocate tOfUCl.
,. i;; 66tioe ploi civil stippiies, HighCourlfor the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
SMt\A'
HIGH COURT
DATED:16i06/2021
ORDER
WP.No.3917 of 2016
,I.
( 'a*
I :f
o
2B J$!{2$?1 .b
o
,"
-!
*...f:l
DISMISSING THE WP FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
b/'
{$-
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G. Srinivas
The State of Telangana
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
