Dismissed
D.Narasimha Rao v. State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/38500/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICET.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO: 385000F 2015
Between:
D.Narasimha Rao, s/olate BhushanamAge:47years, -occ:Kerosene...Hawker.(under Cjni"rruiio"l ot Slroptto.ts003 & 13004-MuddJnuru& Rama.iaramVillages Thallada Mandal, Khammam Dist.
...,ET,T.ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therewith, the HighCourt may be pleasedto issue a writ order or directionmore particularlyone in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Orderissued by the znd respondentin his proceedings Rc. No.C214879/201 3dt:30-10-2015 Cancellingthe petitioner's KeroseneHawker temporary appointmentin respect of Shop.NO'13003 & 13004 of Muddunuruand Ramanujavaram ofThallada tvlandal, Khammam Dist., without showcause noticeand without enquiry isillegal, arbitrary, and violativeof principlesof natural iusticeand consequently set asidethe said orderand direct the respondentsto continue the petitioner as a Kerosene Hawkeras usual
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 49561 0F 2015)
Petition under section151 cPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support.ofthe petition,the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Orderissued by the 2nd respondentin his Proceedings Rc.No.C2l4879/2013dt:30-10-2015,pendingdisposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOWTURUVINAYA KUMAR
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1 : GP FORCIVIL SUPPLIES
Counsel for theRespondent Nos.2 & 3 : GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
I
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO.38500 OF 2015
ORDER:
It is represented by the Learned counsel for the petitioner that he received instructions from the petitioner that the cause for which he filed the present writ petition does not survive and therefore, requested to dismiss the writ petition.
Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand ciosed.
To
SD/-T.KRISHNA KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (-ro
//TRUE COPYi/
SECTION OFFICER
\
HIGHCOURT
DATED:1610612021
ORDER
e S'fAI F
(
C_- 2 flJliu?-$fl )I
i5
'11/
<br>
WP.No.38500 of2015
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS.
o
---xu
D. Narasimha Rao
State of Telangana
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court