Disposed

Mr. Gandra Lingarao and another v. State of Telangana and 5 others

Telangana HC16 Jun 2021WP/3055/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the interference by State and Panchayat officials with petitioners' land measuring 20 guntas in Survey No. 102. The Court directed respondents not to interfere with the land without following due process of law.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents not to interfere with the land of the petitioners in S.No. 102 of Pothugal village without following due process of law.

Mr. Gandra Lingarao and another Vs State of Telangana and… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH^{DAY OF JUNE} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE^{T.AMARNATH GOUD}

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 3055 OF²⁰²¹

¶6

Between:

¶7

Mr. Gandra Lingarao,^{S/o Gandra Rajeswar} -Rao, .Aged^about50 ,years,^Rl/o i.No. z-i+7r,^p5tnugit Village,^{Mogulldpally Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally} District, Telangana 506366.

¶8

Mr. Gandra Madhavarao,^{S/o Gandra Lingarao, Aged. about24 yearcFl/o.H.No.} - i-utl, itrrutit- Vittage, Mogullapally- Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally District, Telangana 506366.

¶9

...PETlrloNER(s)

¶10

AND

¶11

1 . State of Telangana,^{Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department} Secretariat Buildings,^HYderabad

¶12

District Collector, Jayashankar^{BhupalapallyDistrict,Telangana'}

¶13

Mandal Revenue Officer^{(MRO), Pothugal Village, MogullapallyMandal,} Jayashankar Bhupalapally^{District, Telangana}

¶14

4.MandalRevenuelnspector(MRl),PothugalVillage,MogullapallyMandal' Jayashankar Bhupalapally^{District,Telangana'}

¶15

Mandal Surveyor,^{Pothugal Village, Mogullapally Mandal, Jayashankar} BhupalaPallY District,

¶16

6.TelanoanaTheGramPanchayat,PothugalVillage,MogullapallyMandal' Jayas-hankar BhUpalapally^{District,Telangana, Represented by lts Sarpancn.}

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article^{226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiled therewith, the HighCourt may be pleasedto} issue a writ, direction or^{order moreparticularly one in the nature of writof mandamus} under articie 226 of^{Constitutionoi lndia declaring the highhandedactions of the} Respondents in attempting^{to take over about 20 gts of the Petitioners property} ;ithout initiating land aiquisition^{proceedings, paying compensation, as being illegal'} arbitrary, u ncoistitutionai,^{violative of Article 14, and 300A of Constitutionof lndia} and consequently direct^{the Respondentsnot to take over/ interfere with the} petitioners iand idmeasuring Ac.5.39^{Gts in Survey No. 102/A in Mogullapalli} ivtandal,^pothugal Village,^{Jiyashankar BhupalapallyDistrict or any part thereof} without acquiring the^{land, payingcompensationin accordancewithlaw}

¶19

IA NO: 1 0F 2021

¶20

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of^{the petition, the High court may be pleasedto restrain the} Respondents from interfering^{with the Propertyof the Petitioners admeasuringAc.} 5.39 Gts in survey No.^{102/A in tvlogullapalliMandal, Pothugal Village, Jayashankar} Bhupalapally District^{pending disposal of the WritPetition}

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRl. AVINASH DESAI}

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents^{Nos' 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE(TG)}

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No, 6: SRI G NARENDER REDDY, SC^{FOR ZPPlMPP}

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

.I'HE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.3055^{of 2021}

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

It is the case of the^{petitioners that the respondentsare} jntorfering with their land in an extent of 20 guntas in Sy'No'102 of Pot}ugal village of^{MogullapalliMandal, JayashankarBhupalapally} District, and since their^{grievances were not heard by the respondents,} the present writ^petition.

¶29

Heard both sides.

¶30

Counter affidavit^{is filedby the 6m respondent-Grampanchayat'} ,,.',;iliin, it is categoricaily stated that the^{Grampanchayatis not} rrrterl'erir.rg or taking^{over the land of the petitioners in Sy'No' 102'}

¶31

In view ofthe above,^{this writ petitionis disposed of, directing} the respondents not to^{interfere with the land of the petitionersin} Sv.No.102 of Pothugat^{village withoutfollowingdue process of law'} Ni,^;rrder as to costs.

¶32

Pending m iscellaneou^{s appl ications,if anyshallstand closed.}

¶33

//TRUE COPY//

¶34

Sd/-B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To,

l.Thesecretary,stateofTelangana,RevenueDepartmentSecretariatBuildings' Hyderabad

¶39

District Collector,^{Jayashankar Bhupalapally District' Telangana'}

¶40

Mandal Revenue^{Officer (MRO), PqlhugalVillage' Mogullapally Mandal'} - JayashankarBhupalapallyDistrict,Telangana

¶41

(w"f

¶42

Mandal Revenue lnspector (MRl), Pothugal Village, Mogullapally Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally District, Telangana.

¶43

¶44

Mandal Surveyor, Pothugal Village, Mogullapally Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally District,

¶45

Telangana The Gram Panchayat, Pothugal Village, Mogullapally Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapally District, Telangana, Represented by'its Sarpanch.

¶46

One CC to Sri Avinash Desai, Advocate [OPUC]

¶47

Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶48

Two CD Copies

¶49

1 0. One Spare Copy.

rsn gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1610612021

1 HE I4
3 23 J$i 2tl21
PETITION
\ ).,--
)e<br>

¶54

ORDER

¶55

WP.No.3055 o12021

¶56

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶57

WITHOUT COSTS

Mr. Gandra Lingarao and another v. State of Telangana and 5 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Gandra Lingarao and another v. State of Telangana and 5 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bungamatla Ravi Vs The State of Telangana

S.Muralidhar Rao Vs The State of Telangna and 9 others

Mr. P. Narsing Rao, Vs Aushapur Gram Panchayat

D.Narasimha Rao Vs State of Telangana

Akuthota Rama, and 16 Others, Vs Prl.Secy., Civil Supplies Dept., Hyd., and 2 Others

G. Srinivas, S/o. Balakrishna, Vs The State of Telangana