This petition involved a withdrawal application. The petitioner requested permission to withdraw the writ petition, and the court granted the request, dismissing the matter with liberty to file a fresh petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and liberty to file a fresh writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH CO,URT FOR THE STA (s pecia r o;ifi ;,;l[Bf ,,rf,joroo*o
'#5?',atJXtr^.il1ifl al,?,,rifl I.
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITIO NN :2881 OF 1
Between:
i,,}n1?i{31ilri''"rj;.Y;iffJ??[,lT*,t?s#,.?.o",,37 vears, caste sc, Rvo r,4orachinrara
AND
...PETITIONER
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, tn" Hign court may # pL.;; to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularry one in ihe natuie of writ of mandamus, dectaring tle^ ]n^a9t191 of the respondents in not considering the petitioner written representation dt.05.01,2021 regarding the fraud committed oy ine +tir respondent pertuii..,in!- to tn" construction of community ha in petitioner sc colony of il/olachintha la pa ll/ Vittage, Kollapur mandal, Nagarkurnool pursuant to release of full amount given to tne +th respondent granted vide Letter No .A1/ cDp/KLpR t 2017 D1.19.12.ro17 by the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and consequenfly direct the 2nd respondent to conduct detailed enquiry into the incidenl as well as take necessary steps for conslruction of community hall in the aforesaid petitioner SC Colony.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased lo direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the Representation dt.05.01.2021, made by the petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondents No 1 and 3: GPFOR PANCHAYAT RAJRURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the RespondentsNo 2:GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the RespondentsNo 4: -
The Court made the following:OROER
I
THE IION'BLESRI JUSTICE T' AMARNATII GOUD
PE ON No.2881of 2021
ORDER:
Counselfor petitionerseeks permissionfor withdrawalof writ
petitionwith liberty to file a fresh writ petition'
Permissionis granted and this writ petition is dismissed as
,,vithdrawn, granting theliberty sought for. No orderas to costs.
Pending miscellaneousapplications,if any' shall stand closed'
SD/- N,CHANDRA SEKHARRAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
)x.---
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGHCOURT
DATED:1010612021
ORDER
WP.No.2881 of 2021
1 i-\E SIA iq-
\ll
a:)J 22 jlJN 2021 .f.)
I
':r ,^:r.//
.) c 'vy'
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
b 1,<br>
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Venkata Swamy
The State of Telangana
The District Collector
The District Panchayat Raj Engineer
K. Venkata Swamy
T. ARNAMATH GOUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
