Disposed

Ramavath Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Jun 2021WP/2366/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Writ Petition No. 2366 of 2021, the Telangana High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by Sarpanch Ramavath Ramesh challenging the withdrawal of PFMS funds. The Court directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.12.2020 expeditiously under Section 151 CPC.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.12.2020 expeditiously.

Ramavath Ramesh Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 2366 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Ramavath Ramesh,. S/o. Bichya Aged about 28 years, Occ-Upa-sarpanch R/o.Yerra C heruvu Thanda Tirumalagiri Sagar Mandali Nalgonda District.

¶9

,PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Represented by its principal Secretary, panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Lower Tank bund, Hvderabad

¶12

The District Collector, Nalgonda District.

¶13

The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, (tr4pDO) Tirumalagiri Sagar Mandal, Nalgonda District

¶14

Yerra Cheruvu Thanda Gram Panchayat, Rep by its Secretary yerra Cheruvu Thanda Tirumalagiri Sagar IVandal, N-algonda District.

¶15

5 Ramavath Jaggi, S/o.Not known to the Petitioner Aged Ma.ior, Occ- Sarpanch R/o,Yerra Cheruvu Thanda Tirumalagiri Sagar Man-dal, Naigonda Distriit.

¶16

Petition under Articte 226 of the Consriturion of tndia ,;;;5rti3}i:*;: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of lr.4andamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the representation/complaintdt.0T .12.2020 made against the Sth respondent with an allegation that the 5th respondent have forged the cheque bearing No..19001602, dt.21.08.2019 to an amount of Rs.3,00,0001 ind also cheque bearin-g No..19002807, dt 24.12.2019 to an amount of Rs.'r ,50,000/- and withdraw the fu;ds of the 4th Respondent from the treasury office as i egar, arbitrary and contrary to the provrsions of relangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018 anJconsequeniry direct the zno i".pona"nt to :glg'91^{an enquiry against the Sth respondeni} oasing on petitioners'-rlruint d1.07.12.2020.

¶17

IA NO: 10F 21

¶18

Petition under section 1si cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,'tnJ iig'h dourt may be preased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners *p[.untrtion dt.07.12.2020 forthwith and take approprate action aoainst the stn respofioeni, penoing the disposar of the above Writ petition.

¶19

counsel for the petitioner : sRr crRI KUMAR, FoR sRr r. RAJTNTKANTH REDDy Counset for the Resoondent No.1: Cp rOn par.rtiivef RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR REVENUE uounset ror the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: SRI G. NARENDER REDDy,

¶21

FoR GRAMPANcHAYAT counsel for the Respondent No.5:-----sc

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

I ,(

¶24

THE HON'^{BLESRI JUSTICE T} ATH GOUD WRIT PETITI^{ON No.2365 0F2021}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Heard Sri^{Giri Kumar, AdvocaterepresentinElSri Tera} Rajinikanth^{Reddy, Iearnedcounsel for the petitioner and learned} (iove rnment Pleadcrs

¶27

It is the^{case o[ the petitionerthat aggrieved by the trction ol} rvithdrau ing^theamollnts the ul]official^{resPondentsln} the petitioner^{has raised} unauthorisedlY^{forillegal means'} objection^{and filed representation on 07 'l2 2O2O before the District} Collector,^{Nalgonda'Since the said representationisnot} considered,^{the presentwrit petition is hled'}

¶28

Leamed^{Govemment Pleaderswould submitthat the official} respondents^{have initiated action and the sameis in progress'}

¶29

Having^{regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and} in view^{of the submissions made by learnedcounsel' the writ} petition^{is disposed of directing the DistrictCollectorto consider} the represent'ation^{dated 07 '12 '2020 of the petitionerin its entirety} as expeditiouslv^{as possible' in accordancewith lzlu' Thereshail be} no order^{as to costs'}

¶30

Pendingmiscellaneouspetidons'ifany,shallstandclosed

¶31

sD/'N?ltlmrfffrfitR

¶32

¶33

//TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶34

¶35

to",. ,n" Principal Secretary' Panchayat Rai Department' State of Telangana' ' s;;t"i;;Ai, LowerTank bund' Hyderabad 2. ih;'Dl;i;ti^{coiiector,Nalsonda District'}

¶36

¶37

The Mandal Parjshad Development Officer, (lt/PDO) Tirumalagiri Sagar Mandal, Nalgonda District

¶38

The Secretary, Yerra Cheruvu Thanda Gram Panchayat, Yerra Cheruvu Thanda Tirumalagiri Sagar Mandal, Nalgonda District.

¶39

One CC to Sri T. Rajinikanth Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶40

Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT

¶41

One CC to Sri G. Narender Reddy, SC for Grampanchayat, Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶42

Two CD Copies

¶43

ne Spare Copy

SITi

HIGH COURT

DATED:09/06/2021

ORDER

WP.No.2366 ol 2021

o e 1 \4E STA rG:
e
oo-) 1 I JUll:lil
5.
'-::_:-

¶52

DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS

Ramavath Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramavath Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Venkata Narsa Raju Vs State of Telangana and 3 Others

Mir Alam Mandi Vegetable Commission Agents Association and another Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Dantharaveni Kanukaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Mamidi Ashok Vs The State of Telangana

Alugubelli Vijaya Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. S.Lingamani and Another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others