Disposed

Alugubelli Vijaya Laxmi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Jun 2021WP/2543/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition alleging inaction by respondent authorities regarding a representation dated 18.08.2020 concerning an illegal layout. The court disposed of the petition by directing the authorities to consider the fresh representation within one month.

What did the court decide?

Directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the 2nd respondent within two weeks; respondent authorities to consider it within one month.

Alugubelli Vijaya Laxmi Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY^{OF JUNE}

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH^GOUD

¶7

WRIT PETI TION NO: 2543 OF 2 021

¶8

Between:

¶9

Alugubelli Vijaya Laxmi, W/o Madhusudan^{Reddy,_ A99.} 52 years, Occi. Househ<jld and Agriculture,^{R/o H.No. 6-2-1 12212,Plot No} 1, otd v.T. Colony, Nalgonda Town and Dist

¶10

..,WRIT PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The Stale of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary^{PanchayathDepartment,} Secretarial Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶13

2 The District Panchayath Officer, Nalgonda District,^Nalgonda

¶14

3 The l/andal Panchayath Officer, Mandal Praja^{Parishad, Kanagal}

¶15

4 The Lachugudem Grampanchayath, Lachugudem-Gram^{Panchayath,Kangal} l\4andal, Na-lgonda Distribt Rep by^{its PanchayathSecretary,}

¶16

5 Jala Sunitha, W/o Not known to^{the Petitioner Age. 40 yrs, Occ. Household,R/o} Lachugudem, Kanagal Mandal,^{NalgondaDist.}

¶17

6 Bodanapu Venkat Reddy, S/o^{ChandraReddy,Age'56 yrs, Occ. Business, Fl/o} Guttakiddi Annaram Village,^{Nalgonda Mandal and District}

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of^{lhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased} to issue a writ order or^{direction more particularly one in the natureof a writ of} I/andamus - declaring inaction^{of the respondents No. 2lo 4 in taking action against} the illegal layout in 5y.No.^{a56 and 457 admeasuringAc. 2-00 gts situated.within} the revlnue'limits oi^{Lachugudem village by consideringmy representationdt.} 1B 08.2020 as illegal, arbitrary^{and againstthe principlesof natural justice and} provisions of Gram Panchayath Act and^{violative of Articles 14,16,19,21of} Constitution of lnd^ia.

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶21

PetitionunderSectionl5lcPCprayingthatinthecircumstanceSstatedin the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition' the High Court may be pleased to direct} the respondents 2^{to 4 to consider the representation dt. 1810812020 or to pass} necessary order^{or ordersas this Honble Court may deem fit and properin the} circumstances of the^{casein the lnterestsof justice'}

¶22

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:M/S. N ARTHI}

¶23

Corn."f for the^{Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GPFOR PANCHAYAT RAJ& RURAL} DEVELOPMENT

¶24

Corn."t forthe^{Respondent No.4: SRI' G' NARENDER REDDY' SC FORMPPIZPP} Coun""f forthe^{Respondent No' 5: SRI' GODUGU MALLESHAM} iounset for the^{Respondent No. 6: SRI' PASHAM RAVINDRA REDDY}

¶25

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶26

¶27

THE HON,BL^{E SRI JUSTICET. AMARNATHGOUD}

¶28

WRIT PETITI^{ON No.2543 0F 202L}

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Heard learned^{counsel for the petitioner, learnedstanding} counsel and^{learned GovernmentPleader'}

¶31

It is the case of^{the petitionerthat he has filed representation} dated 18.08.2020^{before the 2nd respondentAs the said} representation is not^{consideredby the respondent, the present} writ petition is filed.

¶32

The 4th respondent^{filed counter denyingthe contentions of} the petitioner.

¶33

tlavir-rg regard to the facts^{and circumstallceso[ the case,} without expressing any opinion, the^{writ petitionis disposed of} directing the petitioner to file fresh^{representation,if so advised,} before the 2'd respondent within two^{weeksfrom the date of receipt} of a copy of this order and on receipt^{of the said representation,the} respondent authorities shall consider the same^{and pass} appropriate orders, in accordance with 1aw within^{a period of one} month. No order as to costs.

¶34

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shal1 stand closed

¶35

SD/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER

¶36

To,

¶37

The Principal Secretary Panchayath Department, State of^Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶38

The District Panchayath Officer, Nalgonda^{District, Nalgonda}

¶39

The lVandal Panchayath Officer, Mandal^{Praja Parishad,Kanagal}

¶40

The Lachugudem Grampanchayath,^{Lachugudem Gram Panchayath,Kangal} Mandal, Nalgonda District Rep by^{its PanchayathSecretary.}

¶41

¶42

t, tl

¶43

!. 9n"^{CC to M/s.N. Arthi, Advocate} IOPUCI o. One CC to Sri.G. NarenderReddy,'SC forZpplMpp (OPUC)

¶44

One CC to Sri. Goduou Mallesham, AOro"rt"'1OeUC)

¶45

one cc to Sri. pashim 1r;N.Jp^{il9jlv, njr"ti't"iopucf}

¶46

Two CCs to Gp for panchayat n.i a nrl.uib"rJl-pment,High Court for the . -^{State of Telangana.} IOUTI

¶47

10.Two CD Copies.

¶48

One spare copy

PIV

t {

/^{H|GH COURT}

DATED:0910612021

$E ST4
Y
t)
C rlrl
Ll 18 Jtlll 2()2,|
)

¶55

ORDER

¶56

WP.No.2S43 ot 2021

¶57

Disposing of the WP Without costs.

¶58

\
/)
,/

Alugubelli Vijaya Laxmi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alugubelli Vijaya Laxmi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Venkata Narsa Raju Vs State of Telangana and 3 Others

Mir Alam Mandi Vegetable Commission Agents Association and another Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Dantharaveni Kanukaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Mamidi Ashok Vs The State of Telangana

Ramavath Ramesh Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. S.Lingamani and Another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others