Disposed

Ganga Boina Yuv Raj v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Telangana HC15 Nov 2021WP/23690/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Telangana State Power Distribution Company to provide a new domestic electricity connection to the petitioner's premises. The court dismissed the petition by directing the petitioner to re-submit the application to the authorities.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed on the direction to the petitioner to submit a new application to the respondents, who were directed to accept it and decide within four weeks.

Ganga Boina Yuv Raj Vs The Southern Power… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶2

I\iIONDAY, THE^{FIFTEENTHDAYOF NOVEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^ANDTWENTYONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICET.VINOD KUMAR}

¶5

WRIT PE^{TITIONNO.23690oF221}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Ganqa Boina^{Yuv Raj. S/o Late GangaBoina. Janardan'nS" .7.1 years,Oc,c} H;il:i Ei;. i^{_ a -zt z t l ot rcs *e,'-oang;putracorony,Ramnasa r, lvl usheerabad'} Hyderabad ...PETITIONER

¶8

AND

¶9

l. The Southern^{Power Distribution Company.ofTelanoana State Ltd ' Repby its} chairman^{ano t,tanagin"g 6ii"_qti ri;;ilg'iis coipo"rateoffice at 6-1-50, Mint} ComPound,^{HYderabad5000063'}

¶10

ComPound,^{HYderabad5000063'}

¶11

1. The Divisionur^{enginSS,iEYJ;;iat)operation,Distribution-V'l,city ll, TSSPDCL'} Azamabad, The Assistant^{HYderabad-2OOivisiS|ai"engineer}

¶12

Azamabad, The Assistant^{HYderabad-2OOivisiS|ai"engineer(Electrical)Ooeration' Distribution-Vl' City ll'} sE/op/cHyD^{cENri{il idiir-i'"fl;iiis.JSsioct-Az'amabad, Hvderabad}

¶13

4 The Greater^{uvoeraoJl'Hi'u"niliiii'63r.potitlon'nepbv the Commissioner' Near} Tank Bund, Hyderabad ...RES'ONDENTS

¶14

...RES'ONDENTS

¶15

Petition under^{Article 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleased toissueitawritorderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureofWR|ToF IuANDAMUSdirectingtherespondentslto3toreceiveapplicationandtoprovide domesticnewserviceconnectiontotheresidentialHousebearingNo.l-6212llOTt6st49,GangaputraColony'Ramnagar'ttilusheerabad'Hyderabad' Bounded^{by North:open land South: Road East: road West: Neighbours houseThat} therefusaltoprovidedomesticneWserviceconnectiontotheabovereferred premises is illegal^{and arbitrary'}

¶16

IA NO:Petition 10F 2021under Section 151^{CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{fired in supportof the petition,the High court may be preasedto direct} the respondents'1^{to 3 to receive applicationand to provide new domesticservice} connectiontothehousebearingNo.l.6-212l1o7t65t49.GangaputraColony' Ramnagar,^{Musheerabad, Hyderabad' Boundedby North:open land; South:Road;} East: road;^{West: Neighbours house' without being influencedby the fourth} respondent,^{pendingdisposal of main writ petition and deem fit and proper in the} circumstance^{of the case.}

¶17

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in^{support of the petition, the High court maybe pleasedto receive} the additional material^documents.

¶19

lA NO: 3 OF 2021

¶20

Petition under section^{151 cPc prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High courtmay be pleasedto receive} the additional material^{documents as order or orders as this Hon'bleCourt may} deem fit and^{proper in the circumstancesof the case}

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRITHAKUR ROOPASTNGH}

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1: GP FORENERGY}

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos. 2 & 3: SRIR. VINODREDDY,} S.C. FOR T.S.S.P.D.C.L

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.4: SRI PASHAMKRISHNA REDDY'} S.C, FOR GHMC

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

¶27

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.2369O ot 202L

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energy appearing for respondent No. 1, Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 4th respondent. with their consent, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

¶31

2 In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents, more particularly respondents 2 & 3, in relusing to provide new domestic service connection to the residential building of the petitioner bearing House No.1-6-212/lO7l65/49, Gangaputra Colony, Ramnagar, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities are not receiving the application made by the petitioner and not providing new domestic service connection to the sr-rbject premises belonging to the petitioner, despite paying requisite fees.

¶33

Learned Standing Counsel lbr respondent Nos.2 and 3, on instructions, submits that if the petitioner makes an application, again, the authorities will receive the same and pass necessary orders thereon, as per 1aw.

¶34

In view of the above made submissions, the petitioner is directed to submit an application before respondents Nos.2 and 3 seeking to provide new domestic service connection, which shall be received by the authorities and necessary orders be passed

¶35

..) ,.

¶36

thereon, strictly as per 1aw, AS expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶37

6 Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶38

7 Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall

stand

closed.

,TRUE COPY//

SD/.N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTSNT REGISTRAR

¶43

SECTION OFFICER

¶44

To,

¶45

The chairman and Managing Director, Southern power Distribution companv of Terangana state Ltd.. rrivin-g its corporatt ciriJ"^'ii'o:r:so, il"i,lit?i#pl,i.0, Hyderabad 5000063.

¶46

The Divisionar Enoineer (Erectricar) operation, Distribution-Vl , city il, TSSpDCL, Azamabad, HvdeEbaa-Zo

¶47

3 The Assistan[ Divisionar Engrneer (Erectricar) operation, Distribution-vr, city [, s E/o^p/c H^y D c E Nr RA L. A E-na m ni ga r 6e i5 s-{rib i [i', ilil;, h",i # ;; U.

¶48

The commissioner. Greater Hvoeribzo vrunrcii'irtorporation, Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

¶49

9n"^{CC to Sri Thakur to Sri Thakur Sri Thakur ThakurRoopa.Singtr,} Advocate [OpUC]

¶50

9n"^{CC to Sri Thakur to Sri Thakur Sri Thakur ThakurRoopa.Singtr,} Advocate [OpUC] 6. Two ccs to cp ror Energv, High "cdur[tbi-ti; SIutJoi rur.ngana at Hyderabad. louTl

¶51

I 9n"^{CC to Sri R. Vinod} Bggov,^g.C for T.S.S.p.D.C.L. (opUC)

¶52

1. Two one CD Cooies.CC to Sri^pasham Krishrid neodt;s.a.To;'dn-nlc topucj

10.One Spare bopy.

anv k$!

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 511112021

ORDER

1 i4 i--.
,J'
)
1) 3 t NOV ieJ
'
!:- :i'"

¶60

WP.No.23690 of 2021

¶61

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

Ganga Boina Yuv Raj v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganga Boina Yuv Raj v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Psk Infrastructures and Projects Pvt. Ltd., Hyd Vs M/S Sew Constructions Ltd., Hyd

M/s. Gsn Ferro Alloys Limited (In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent

M/s. Taurus Earthmovers Ltd.,(In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent

Mohd. Abdul Shahid Vs The State of Telangana

Mallikarjun Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others

M/s. V.V.R Constructions Vs The state of Telangana