Dismissed

M/S.Psk Infrastructures and Projects Pvt. Ltd., Hyd v. M/S Sew Constructions Ltd., Hyd

Telangana HC12 Nov 2021ARBAPPL/16/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the withdrawal of Arbitration Application No. 16 of 2017 filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and dismissed the application as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Arbitration Application No. 16 of 2017 dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions dismissed. No costs.

M/S.Psk Infrastructures and Projects Pvt. Ltd., Hyd Vs M/S Sew… — Arbitration | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

ARBITRATION APPLI TtoN NO. 16 0F 2017

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s. PSK lnfrastructures and Projects P!'t. Ltd., Regd. Office #8-2-248h^l7l5'l, Plot No.51 , Nagarjuna Hills, Punjaguta, Hyderabad^- 500^{082 Rep.} by^its Authorized Signatory Mr.V.S.S.R.S. Prakash.

¶9

...APPLICANT

¶10

AND

¶11

M/s. Sew lnfrastructures Ltd., # 6-3-871,^{Snehalatha,1st Floor,Green Lands} Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad^- 500 016. Bep,^{by its Director Sri S. Anil Kumar} (Causetitile amended as per Court Order Dt.31-03'2017 vide Appl.No.168 of 2007).

¶12

...RESPONDENT

¶13

Application under Section 11⁽⁵ & 6) of the^{Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996} and Scheme of Appointment of Arbitrator^{praying that in the circumstances statedin the} affidavit filed therewith, the High^{Court maybe pleased to}

¶14

i) To appoint an Arbitrator on behalf^{of the Respondentalong with the Arbitrator} named by the Applicant may adjudicate^{the claimsand disputes between the} applicant and resPondent.

¶15

ii) To award the cost of the application and

¶16

This Application coming on for^{hearing, upon perusingthe Application and} affidavit filed in support thereof and^{upon hearing the arguments of sri Y. Balaji,} Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri^{AvinashDesai,Advocate for the Respondent.}

¶17

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶18

THE HON^,BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶19

ARBITRATION APPLCIATION N o.16 0F 2017

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

Sri Kamal Kalyan, Learned Counsel representing Sri y. Balaji, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to n ithdrzrrv the Arbitration Application.

¶22

Gr:rnting such permission, the Arbitration Application is

¶23

dismissed as u,ithdrawn. The miscellaneous peritions pcnding, if

¶24

any, shall also stand dismissed. No costs.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/-K.SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

v- SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to Sri Y. Balaji, Advocate [OPUC]

¶33

2 One CC to Sri Avinash Desai, Advocate [OPUC]

¶34

2 Two CD Copies

¶35

4 One Spare Copy s^br

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1211112021

ORDER

',?==:<br>'( r\E $ia i6-
/t,
/Ak
t
o
0 7 E'tCl0?i ,{.l
,^

¶40

ARB.APPL.No.16 of 2017

¶41

DISMISSING THE APPLICATION AS WITHDRAWN

¶42

5-
t,

M/S.Psk Infrastructures and Projects Pvt. Ltd., Hyd v. M/S Sew Constructions Ltd., Hyd

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Psk Infrastructures and Projects Pvt. Ltd., Hyd v. M/S Sew Constructions Ltd., Hyd

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manthapuram Bala Krishna Rao Vs State of Telangana

M/s. Modi Builders and Realtors Pvt. Ltd, Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Shabuddin Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Gsn Ferro Alloys Limited (In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent

M/s. Taurus Earthmovers Ltd.,(In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent

M/s. World Wide Pharmaceuticals Ltd.,(In Liqn.) Vs No Respondent